From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0DAB3855026 for ; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:55:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F0DAB3855026 Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 167GX82d151968; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 12:55:34 -0400 Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 39mm66nb9n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 07 Jul 2021 12:55:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 167GmKKM020487; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:55:33 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 39jfhcra5u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 07 Jul 2021 16:55:33 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 167GtWga39649588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:55:32 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9D1AE067; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:55:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F154CAE062; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:55:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.65.201.128] (unknown [9.65.201.128]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:55:31 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Add MMA __builtin_vsx_lxvp and __builtin_vsx_stxvp built-ins To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: wschmidt@linux.ibm.com, GCC Patches References: <6797c56b-bc5a-2410-4a90-424cda38abaf@linux.ibm.com> <20210701190106.GE1583@gate.crashing.org> <40762b42-1091-8e59-03ed-e0284f5fd93e@linux.ibm.com> <20210706220530.GK1583@gate.crashing.org> From: Peter Bergner Message-ID: <6e67cdba-4bbe-2faa-e07d-a3c246813c43@linux.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:55:31 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210706220530.GK1583@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: knstHGkfu5hBkGBby18gjlEAp1pYj9S9 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: knstHGkfu5hBkGBby18gjlEAp1pYj9S9 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-07_08:2021-07-06, 2021-07-07 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=892 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2107070095 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 16:55:36 -0000 On 7/6/21 5:05 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 04:13:06PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On 7/6/21 3:08 PM, Bill Schmidt wrote: >>> On 7/6/21 2:29 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: >>>> These are RS6000_BTC_GIMPLE, so I think they should be handled within >>>> the "if (gimple_func) ..." leg.  That said, how about the following >>>> change to resolve the issue you have?  I'll kick off a bootstrap and >>>> regtest for this change. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, yes, that works for me! >> >> Great, thanks! >> >> >> Segher, the patch was clean on testing. Ok with you too? > > Of course. Okay for trunk and backports (you might want to hurry it > for 11.2). Thanks to you both! Ok, committed to trunk. I'm testing the GCC 11 backport now and will commit if clean. Thanks. Peter