From: Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com>
To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][Arm] Add pattern for bswap + rotate -> rev16 [Bug 108933]
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:14:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7132896e-b5ce-4442-815e-97c1a6ae0913@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c987c596-f0ec-4b32-b339-a79b3545a435@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3431 bytes --]
Hi Richard,
Please find below the new patch where I addressed your comments and
updated the changelog.
rev16 pattern was not recognised anymore as a change in the bswap tree
pass was introducing a new GIMPLE form, not recognized by the assembly
final transformation pass.
More details in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108933
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/108933
* config/arm/arm.md (arm_rev16si2): Convert to define_insn.
Correct generated RTL.
(arm_rev16si2_alt1): Correctly handle conditional execution.
(arm_rev16si2_alt2): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/108933
* gcc.target/arm/rev16.c: Moved to...
* gcc.target/arm/rev16_1.c: ...here.
* gcc.target/arm/rev16_2.c: New test to check that rev16 is
emitted.
On 2024-01-22 16:25, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 22/01/2024 12:18, Matthieu Longo wrote:
>> rev16 pattern was not recognised anymore as a change in the bswap tree
>> pass was introducing a new GIMPLE form, not recognized by the assembly
>> final transformation pass.
>>
>> More details in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108933
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> PR target/108933
>> * config/arm/arm.md (*arm_rev16si2_alt3): new pattern to convert
>> a bswap + rotate by 16 bits into rev16
>
> ChangeLog entries need to be written as sentences, so start with a capital letter and end with a full stop; continuation lines should start in column 8 (one hard tab, don't use spaces). But in this case, "New pattern." is sufficient.
>
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> PR target/108933
>> * gcc.target/arm/rev16.c: Moved to...
>> * gcc.target/arm/rev16_1.c: ...here.
>> * gcc.target/arm/rev16_2.c: New test to check that rev16 is
>> emitted.
>
>
> +;; Similar pattern to match (rotate (bswap) 16)
> +(define_insn "*arm_rev16si2_alt3"
> + [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=l,r")
> + (rotate:SI (bswap:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "l,r"))
> + (const_int 16)))]
> + "arm_arch6"
> + "rev16\\t%0, %1"
> + [(set_attr "arch" "t,32")
> + (set_attr "length" "2,4")
> + (set_attr "type" "rev")]
> +)
> +
>
> Unfortunately, this is insufficient. When generating Arm or Thumb2 code (but not thumb1) we also have to handle conditional execution: we need to have '%?' in the output template at the point where a condition code might be needed. That means we need separate output templates for all three alternatives (as we need a 16-bit variant for thumb2 that's conditional and a 16-bit for thumb1 that isn't). See the output of arm_rev16 for a guide of what is really needed.
>
> I note that the arm_rev16si2_alt1, and arm_rev16si2_alt2 patterns are incorrect in this regard as well; that will need fixing.
>
> I also see that arm_rev16si2 currently expands to the alt1 variant above; given that the preferred canonical form would now appear to use bswap + rotate, we should change that as well. In fact, we can merge your new pattern with the expand entirely and eliminate the need to call gen_arm_rev16si2_alt1. Something like:
>
> (define_insn "arm_rev16si2"
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand")
> (rotate:SI (bswap:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand")) (const_int 16))]
> "arm_arch6"
> "@
> rev16...
> ...
>
>
> R.
>
[-- Attachment #2: 108933 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2781 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
index 4a98f2d7b6251da940806b26d4c310a7f7af927b..5816409f86f1106b410c5e21d77e599b485f85f2 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
@@ -12578,7 +12578,10 @@ (define_insn "arm_rev16si2_alt1"
"arm_arch6
&& aarch_rev16_shleft_mask_imm_p (operands[3], SImode)
&& aarch_rev16_shright_mask_imm_p (operands[2], SImode)"
- "rev16\\t%0, %1"
+ "@
+ rev16\t%0, %1
+ rev16%?\t%0, %1
+ rev16%?\t%0, %1"
[(set_attr "arch" "t1,t2,32")
(set_attr "length" "2,2,4")
(set_attr "type" "rev")]
@@ -12595,22 +12598,28 @@ (define_insn "*arm_rev16si2_alt2"
"arm_arch6
&& aarch_rev16_shleft_mask_imm_p (operands[3], SImode)
&& aarch_rev16_shright_mask_imm_p (operands[2], SImode)"
- "rev16\\t%0, %1"
+ "@
+ rev16\t%0, %1
+ rev16%?\t%0, %1
+ rev16%?\t%0, %1"
[(set_attr "arch" "t1,t2,32")
(set_attr "length" "2,2,4")
(set_attr "type" "rev")]
)
-(define_expand "arm_rev16si2"
- [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand")
- (bswap:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand")))]
+;; Similar pattern to match (rotate (bswap) 16)
+(define_insn "arm_rev16si2"
+ [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=l,l,r")
+ (rotate:SI (bswap:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "l,l,r"))
+ (const_int 16)))]
"arm_arch6"
- {
- rtx left = gen_int_mode (HOST_WIDE_INT_C (0xff00ff00ff00ff00), SImode);
- rtx right = gen_int_mode (HOST_WIDE_INT_C (0xff00ff00ff00ff), SImode);
- emit_insn (gen_arm_rev16si2_alt1 (operands[0], operands[1], right, left));
- DONE;
- }
+ "@
+ rev16\t%0, %1
+ rev16%?\t%0, %1
+ rev16%?\t%0, %1"
+ [(set_attr "arch" "t1,t2,32")
+ (set_attr "length" "2,2,4")
+ (set_attr "type" "rev")]
)
(define_expand "bswaphi2"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/rev16.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/rev16_1.c
similarity index 100%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/rev16.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/rev16_1.c
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/rev16_2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/rev16_2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90213f9b49f45340ced4f29c31446971dbc88ecd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/rev16_2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+typedef unsigned int __u32;
+
+__u32
+__rev16_32_alt (__u32 x)
+{
+ return (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff00ff00UL) >> 8)
+ | (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff00ffUL) << 8);
+}
+
+__u32
+__rev16_32 (__u32 x)
+{
+ return (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff00ffUL) << 8)
+ | (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff00ff00UL) >> 8);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {rev16\tr[0-9]+, r[0-9]+} 2 } } */
\ No newline at end of file
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 12:18 Matthieu Longo
2024-01-22 16:25 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2024-01-29 14:14 ` Matthieu Longo [this message]
2024-01-29 16:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7132896e-b5ce-4442-815e-97c1a6ae0913@arm.com \
--to=matthieu.longo@arm.com \
--cc=Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).