[PATCH] tree-cfg: Make the verifier returns_twice message translatable

[PATCH] tree-cfg: Make the verifier returns_twice message translatable

[Jakub Jelinek]

Hi!

While translation of the verifier messages is questionable, that case is
something that ideally should never happen except to gcc developers
and so pressumably English should be fine, we use error etc. APIs and
those imply translatations and some translators translate it.
The following patch adjusts the code such that we don't emit
appel returns_twice est not first dans le bloc de base 33
in French (i.e. 2 English word in the middle of a French message).
Similarly Swedish or Ukrainian. 
Note, the German translator did differentiate between these verifier
messages vs. normal user facing and translated it to:
"Interner Fehler: returns_twice call is %s in basic block %d"
so just a German prefix before English message.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2024-04-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* tree-cfg.cc (gimple_verify_flow_info): Make the misplaced
	returns_twice diagnostics translatable.

--- gcc/tree-cfg.cc.jj	2024-04-10 10:19:04.237471564 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-cfg.cc	2024-04-11 17:18:57.962672110 +0200
@@ -5818,7 +5818,7 @@ gimple_verify_flow_info (void)
 	  if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_CALL
 	      && gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_RETURNS_TWICE)
 	    {
-	      const char *misplaced = NULL;
+	      bool misplaced = false;
 	      /* TM is an exception: it points abnormal edges just after the
 		 call that starts a transaction, i.e. it must end the BB.  */
 	      if (gimple_call_builtin_p (stmt, BUILT_IN_TM_START))
@@ -5826,18 +5826,23 @@ gimple_verify_flow_info (void)
 		  if (single_succ_p (bb)
 		      && bb_has_abnormal_pred (single_succ (bb))
 		      && !gsi_one_nondebug_before_end_p (gsi))
-		    misplaced = "not last";
+		    {
+		      error ("returns_twice call is not last in basic block "
+			     "%d", bb->index);
+		      misplaced = true;
+		    }
 		}
 	      else
 		{
-		  if (seen_nondebug_stmt
-		      && bb_has_abnormal_pred (bb))
-		    misplaced = "not first";
+		  if (seen_nondebug_stmt && bb_has_abnormal_pred (bb))
+		    {
+		      error ("returns_twice call is not first in basic block "
+			     "%d", bb->index);
+		      misplaced = true;
+		    }
 		}
 	      if (misplaced)
 		{
-		  error ("returns_twice call is %s in basic block %d",
-			 misplaced, bb->index);
 		  print_gimple_stmt (stderr, stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM);
 		  err = true;
 		}

	Jakub

Re: [PATCH] tree-cfg: Make the verifier returns_twice message translatable

[Richard Biener]

> Am 12.04.2024 um 09:58 schrieb Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> While translation of the verifier messages is questionable, that case is
> something that ideally should never happen except to gcc developers
> and so pressumably English should be fine, we use error etc. APIs and
> those imply translatations and some translators translate it.
> The following patch adjusts the code such that we don't emit
> appel returns_twice est not first dans le bloc de base 33
> in French (i.e. 2 English word in the middle of a French message).
> Similarly Swedish or Ukrainian.
> Note, the German translator did differentiate between these verifier
> messages vs. normal user facing and translated it to:
> "Interner Fehler: returns_twice call is %s in basic block %d"
> so just a German prefix before English message.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Ok

Richard 

> 2024-04-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
>    * tree-cfg.cc (gimple_verify_flow_info): Make the misplaced
>    returns_twice diagnostics translatable.
> 
> --- gcc/tree-cfg.cc.jj    2024-04-10 10:19:04.237471564 +0200
> +++ gcc/tree-cfg.cc    2024-04-11 17:18:57.962672110 +0200
> @@ -5818,7 +5818,7 @@ gimple_verify_flow_info (void)
>      if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_CALL
>          && gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_RETURNS_TWICE)
>        {
> -          const char *misplaced = NULL;
> +          bool misplaced = false;
>          /* TM is an exception: it points abnormal edges just after the
>         call that starts a transaction, i.e. it must end the BB.  */
>          if (gimple_call_builtin_p (stmt, BUILT_IN_TM_START))
> @@ -5826,18 +5826,23 @@ gimple_verify_flow_info (void)
>          if (single_succ_p (bb)
>              && bb_has_abnormal_pred (single_succ (bb))
>              && !gsi_one_nondebug_before_end_p (gsi))
> -            misplaced = "not last";
> +            {
> +              error ("returns_twice call is not last in basic block "
> +                 "%d", bb->index);
> +              misplaced = true;
> +            }
>        }
>          else
>        {
> -          if (seen_nondebug_stmt
> -              && bb_has_abnormal_pred (bb))
> -            misplaced = "not first";
> +          if (seen_nondebug_stmt && bb_has_abnormal_pred (bb))
> +            {
> +              error ("returns_twice call is not first in basic block "
> +                 "%d", bb->index);
> +              misplaced = true;
> +            }
>        }
>          if (misplaced)
>        {
> -          error ("returns_twice call is %s in basic block %d",
> -             misplaced, bb->index);
>          print_gimple_stmt (stderr, stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM);
>          err = true;
>        }
> 
>    Jakub
>