* [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605]
@ 2022-05-18 8:52 HAO CHEN GUI
2022-05-30 1:24 ` Ping " HAO CHEN GUI
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: HAO CHEN GUI @ 2022-05-18 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Segher Boessenkool, David, Kewen.Lin, Peter Bergner
Hi,
This patch implements optab f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp on rs6000.
Tests show that outputs of xs[min/max]dp are consistent with the standard
of C99 fmin/max.
This patch also binds __builtin_vsx_xs[min/max]dp to fmin/max instead
of smin/max. So the builtins always generate xs[min/max]dp on all
platforms.
Bootstrapped and tested on ppc64 Linux BE and LE with no regressions.
Is this okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.
ChangeLog
2022-05-18 Haochen Gui <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
gcc/
PR target/103605
* rs6000.md (FMINMAX): New.
(minmax_op): New.
(f<minmax_op><mode>3): New pattern by UNSPEC_FMAX and UNSPEC_FMIN.
* rs6000-builtins.def (__builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp): Set pattern to fmaxdf3.
(__builtin_vsx_xsmindp): Set pattern to fmindf3.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/103605
* gcc.dg/pr103605.c: New.
patch.diff
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
index f4a9f24bcc5..8b735493b40 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
@@ -1613,10 +1613,10 @@
XSCVSPDP vsx_xscvspdp {}
const double __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (double, double);
- XSMAXDP smaxdf3 {}
+ XSMAXDP fmaxdf3 {}
const double __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (double, double);
- XSMINDP smindf3 {}
+ XSMINDP fmindf3 {}
const double __builtin_vsx_xsrdpi (double);
XSRDPI vsx_xsrdpi {}
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
index bf85baa5370..197de0838ee 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
@@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ (define_c_enum "unspec"
UNSPEC_HASHCHK
UNSPEC_XXSPLTIDP_CONST
UNSPEC_XXSPLTIW_CONST
+ UNSPEC_FMAX
+ UNSPEC_FMIN
])
;;
@@ -5341,6 +5343,22 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*s<minmax><mode>3_fpr"
DONE;
})
+
+(define_int_iterator FMINMAX [UNSPEC_FMAX UNSPEC_FMIN])
+
+(define_int_attr minmax_op [(UNSPEC_FMAX "max")
+ (UNSPEC_FMIN "min")])
+
+(define_insn "f<minmax_op><mode>3"
+ [(set (match_operand:SFDF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
+ (unspec:SFDF [(match_operand:SFDF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")
+ (match_operand:SFDF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
+ FMINMAX))]
+"TARGET_VSX"
+"xs<minmax_op>dp %x0,%x1,%x2"
+[(set_attr "type" "fp")]
+)
+
(define_expand "mov<mode>cc"
[(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "gpc_reg_operand")
(if_then_else:GPR (match_operand 1 "comparison_operator")
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e43ac40c2d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1 -mvsx" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxsmaxdp\M} 3 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxsmindp\M} 3 } } */
+
+#include <math.h>
+
+double test1 (double d0, double d1)
+{
+ return fmin (d0, d1);
+}
+
+float test2 (float d0, float d1)
+{
+ return fmin (d0, d1);
+}
+
+double test3 (double d0, double d1)
+{
+ return fmax (d0, d1);
+}
+
+float test4 (float d0, float d1)
+{
+ return fmax (d0, d1);
+}
+
+double test5 (double d0, double d1)
+{
+ return __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (d0, d1);
+}
+
+double test6 (double d0, double d1)
+{
+ return __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (d0, d1);
+}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Ping [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605]
2022-05-18 8:52 [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605] HAO CHEN GUI
@ 2022-05-30 1:24 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2022-05-30 9:56 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-06-01 21:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: HAO CHEN GUI @ 2022-05-30 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Segher Boessenkool, David, Kewen.Lin, Peter Bergner
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595164.html
Thanks.
On 18/5/2022 下午 4:52, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch implements optab f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp on rs6000.
> Tests show that outputs of xs[min/max]dp are consistent with the standard
> of C99 fmin/max.
>
> This patch also binds __builtin_vsx_xs[min/max]dp to fmin/max instead
> of smin/max. So the builtins always generate xs[min/max]dp on all
> platforms.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on ppc64 Linux BE and LE with no regressions.
> Is this okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.
>
> ChangeLog
> 2022-05-18 Haochen Gui <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
>
> gcc/
> PR target/103605
> * rs6000.md (FMINMAX): New.
> (minmax_op): New.
> (f<minmax_op><mode>3): New pattern by UNSPEC_FMAX and UNSPEC_FMIN.
> * rs6000-builtins.def (__builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp): Set pattern to fmaxdf3.
> (__builtin_vsx_xsmindp): Set pattern to fmindf3.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR target/103605
> * gcc.dg/pr103605.c: New.
>
> patch.diff
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> index f4a9f24bcc5..8b735493b40 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> @@ -1613,10 +1613,10 @@
> XSCVSPDP vsx_xscvspdp {}
>
> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (double, double);
> - XSMAXDP smaxdf3 {}
> + XSMAXDP fmaxdf3 {}
>
> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (double, double);
> - XSMINDP smindf3 {}
> + XSMINDP fmindf3 {}
>
> const double __builtin_vsx_xsrdpi (double);
> XSRDPI vsx_xsrdpi {}
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> index bf85baa5370..197de0838ee 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> @@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ (define_c_enum "unspec"
> UNSPEC_HASHCHK
> UNSPEC_XXSPLTIDP_CONST
> UNSPEC_XXSPLTIW_CONST
> + UNSPEC_FMAX
> + UNSPEC_FMIN
> ])
>
> ;;
> @@ -5341,6 +5343,22 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*s<minmax><mode>3_fpr"
> DONE;
> })
>
> +
> +(define_int_iterator FMINMAX [UNSPEC_FMAX UNSPEC_FMIN])
> +
> +(define_int_attr minmax_op [(UNSPEC_FMAX "max")
> + (UNSPEC_FMIN "min")])
> +
> +(define_insn "f<minmax_op><mode>3"
> + [(set (match_operand:SFDF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
> + (unspec:SFDF [(match_operand:SFDF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")
> + (match_operand:SFDF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
> + FMINMAX))]
> +"TARGET_VSX"
> +"xs<minmax_op>dp %x0,%x1,%x2"
> +[(set_attr "type" "fp")]
> +)
> +
> (define_expand "mov<mode>cc"
> [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "gpc_reg_operand")
> (if_then_else:GPR (match_operand 1 "comparison_operator")
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..e43ac40c2d1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O1 -mvsx" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxsmaxdp\M} 3 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxsmindp\M} 3 } } */
> +
> +#include <math.h>
> +
> +double test1 (double d0, double d1)
> +{
> + return fmin (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +float test2 (float d0, float d1)
> +{
> + return fmin (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +double test3 (double d0, double d1)
> +{
> + return fmax (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +float test4 (float d0, float d1)
> +{
> + return fmax (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +double test5 (double d0, double d1)
> +{
> + return __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +double test6 (double d0, double d1)
> +{
> + return __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (d0, d1);
> +}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605]
2022-05-18 8:52 [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605] HAO CHEN GUI
2022-05-30 1:24 ` Ping " HAO CHEN GUI
@ 2022-05-30 9:56 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-06-01 21:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kewen.Lin @ 2022-05-30 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: HAO CHEN GUI; +Cc: Segher Boessenkool, David, Peter Bergner, gcc-patches
Hi Haochen,
on 2022/5/18 16:52, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch implements optab f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp on rs6000.
> Tests show that outputs of xs[min/max]dp are consistent with the standard
> of C99 fmin/max.
>
> This patch also binds __builtin_vsx_xs[min/max]dp to fmin/max instead
> of smin/max. So the builtins always generate xs[min/max]dp on all
> platforms.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on ppc64 Linux BE and LE with no regressions.
> Is this okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.
>
> ChangeLog
> 2022-05-18 Haochen Gui <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
>
> gcc/
> PR target/103605
> * rs6000.md (FMINMAX): New.
> (minmax_op): New.
> (f<minmax_op><mode>3): New pattern by UNSPEC_FMAX and UNSPEC_FMIN.
> * rs6000-builtins.def (__builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp): Set pattern to fmaxdf3.
> (__builtin_vsx_xsmindp): Set pattern to fmindf3.
>
These changelog entries look wrong to me, they miss the relative path names.
* config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def ...
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md ...
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR target/103605
> * gcc.dg/pr103605.c: New.
... and wrong path here.
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c: New test.
OK with the changelog above fixed. Thanks!
BR,
Kewen
>
> patch.diff
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> index f4a9f24bcc5..8b735493b40 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> @@ -1613,10 +1613,10 @@
> XSCVSPDP vsx_xscvspdp {}
>
> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (double, double);
> - XSMAXDP smaxdf3 {}
> + XSMAXDP fmaxdf3 {}
>
> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (double, double);
> - XSMINDP smindf3 {}
> + XSMINDP fmindf3 {}
>
> const double __builtin_vsx_xsrdpi (double);
> XSRDPI vsx_xsrdpi {}
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> index bf85baa5370..197de0838ee 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> @@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ (define_c_enum "unspec"
> UNSPEC_HASHCHK
> UNSPEC_XXSPLTIDP_CONST
> UNSPEC_XXSPLTIW_CONST
> + UNSPEC_FMAX
> + UNSPEC_FMIN
> ])
>
> ;;
> @@ -5341,6 +5343,22 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*s<minmax><mode>3_fpr"
> DONE;
> })
>
> +
> +(define_int_iterator FMINMAX [UNSPEC_FMAX UNSPEC_FMIN])
> +
> +(define_int_attr minmax_op [(UNSPEC_FMAX "max")
> + (UNSPEC_FMIN "min")])
> +
> +(define_insn "f<minmax_op><mode>3"
> + [(set (match_operand:SFDF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
> + (unspec:SFDF [(match_operand:SFDF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")
> + (match_operand:SFDF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
> + FMINMAX))]
> +"TARGET_VSX"
> +"xs<minmax_op>dp %x0,%x1,%x2"
> +[(set_attr "type" "fp")]
> +)
> +
> (define_expand "mov<mode>cc"
> [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "gpc_reg_operand")
> (if_then_else:GPR (match_operand 1 "comparison_operator")
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..e43ac40c2d1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103605.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O1 -mvsx" } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxsmaxdp\M} 3 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxsmindp\M} 3 } } */
> +
> +#include <math.h>
> +
> +double test1 (double d0, double d1)
> +{
> + return fmin (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +float test2 (float d0, float d1)
> +{
> + return fmin (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +double test3 (double d0, double d1)
> +{
> + return fmax (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +float test4 (float d0, float d1)
> +{
> + return fmax (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +double test5 (double d0, double d1)
> +{
> + return __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (d0, d1);
> +}
> +
> +double test6 (double d0, double d1)
> +{
> + return __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (d0, d1);
> +}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605]
2022-05-18 8:52 [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605] HAO CHEN GUI
2022-05-30 1:24 ` Ping " HAO CHEN GUI
2022-05-30 9:56 ` Kewen.Lin
@ 2022-06-01 21:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-06-07 1:51 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2022-06-01 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: HAO CHEN GUI; +Cc: gcc-patches, David, Kewen.Lin, Peter Bergner
Hi!
Some more nitpicking...
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 04:52:26PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (double, double);
> - XSMAXDP smaxdf3 {}
> + XSMAXDP fmaxdf3 {}
>
> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (double, double);
> - XSMINDP smindf3 {}
> + XSMINDP fmindf3 {}
Are s{min,max}df3 still used after this?
> + UNSPEC_FMAX
> + UNSPEC_FMIN
Pity we have to do this as an unspec still, this should be handled by
some generic code, with some new operator (fmin/fmax would be obvious
names :-) )
> +(define_insn "f<minmax_op><mode>3"
> + [(set (match_operand:SFDF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
> + (unspec:SFDF [(match_operand:SFDF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")
> + (match_operand:SFDF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
> + FMINMAX))]
> +"TARGET_VSX"
> +"xs<minmax_op>dp %x0,%x1,%x2"
> +[(set_attr "type" "fp")]
> +)
Indentation is broken here, correct is
(define_insn "f<minmax_op><mode>3"
[(set (match_operand:SFDF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
(unspec:SFDF [(match_operand:SFDF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")
(match_operand:SFDF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
FMINMAX))]
"TARGET_VSX"
"xs<minmax_op>dp %x0,%x1,%x2"
[(set_attr "type" "fp")])
(FMINMAX has the same indent as the preceding [, its sibling;
"TARGET_VSX" and the next two lines are indented like the same thing
before it at the same level (the "[(set"); the finishing ) does never
start a new line).
Segher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605]
2022-06-01 21:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
@ 2022-06-07 1:51 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2022-06-07 20:44 ` Segher Boessenkool
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: HAO CHEN GUI @ 2022-06-07 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Segher Boessenkool; +Cc: gcc-patches, David, Kewen.Lin, Peter Bergner
Hi,
On 2/6/2022 上午 5:01, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Some more nitpicking...
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 04:52:26PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
>> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (double, double);
>> - XSMAXDP smaxdf3 {}
>> + XSMAXDP fmaxdf3 {}
>>
>> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (double, double);
>> - XSMINDP smindf3 {}
>> + XSMINDP fmindf3 {}
>
> Are s{min,max}df3 still used after this?
Expands reduc_s[min|max]_scal are still using s[min|max]df3.
OPTAB_D (reduc_smax_scal_optab, "reduc_smax_scal_$a")
OPTAB_D (reduc_smin_scal_optab, "reduc_smin_scal_$a")
Also we could implement reduc_f[min|max]_scal after committing
this patch.
Thanks.
Gui Haochen
>
>> + UNSPEC_FMAX
>> + UNSPEC_FMIN
>
> Pity we have to do this as an unspec still, this should be handled by
> some generic code, with some new operator (fmin/fmax would be obvious
> names :-) )
>
>> +(define_insn "f<minmax_op><mode>3"
>> + [(set (match_operand:SFDF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
>> + (unspec:SFDF [(match_operand:SFDF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")
>> + (match_operand:SFDF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
>> + FMINMAX))]
>> +"TARGET_VSX"
>> +"xs<minmax_op>dp %x0,%x1,%x2"
>> +[(set_attr "type" "fp")]
>> +)
>
> Indentation is broken here, correct is
>
> (define_insn "f<minmax_op><mode>3"
> [(set (match_operand:SFDF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
> (unspec:SFDF [(match_operand:SFDF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")
> (match_operand:SFDF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
> FMINMAX))]
> "TARGET_VSX"
> "xs<minmax_op>dp %x0,%x1,%x2"
> [(set_attr "type" "fp")])
>
> (FMINMAX has the same indent as the preceding [, its sibling;
> "TARGET_VSX" and the next two lines are indented like the same thing
> before it at the same level (the "[(set"); the finishing ) does never
> start a new line).
>
>
> Segher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605]
2022-06-07 1:51 ` HAO CHEN GUI
@ 2022-06-07 20:44 ` Segher Boessenkool
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2022-06-07 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: HAO CHEN GUI; +Cc: gcc-patches, David, Kewen.Lin, Peter Bergner
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:51:43AM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> On 2/6/2022 上午 5:01, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 04:52:26PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> >> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmaxdp (double, double);
> >> - XSMAXDP smaxdf3 {}
> >> + XSMAXDP fmaxdf3 {}
> >>
> >> const double __builtin_vsx_xsmindp (double, double);
> >> - XSMINDP smindf3 {}
> >> + XSMINDP fmindf3 {}
> >
> > Are s{min,max}df3 still used after this?
>
> Expands reduc_s[min|max]_scal are still using s[min|max]df3.
Ah, and reduction is undefined for float unless fast-math anyway. Okay.
> Also we could implement reduc_f[min|max]_scal after committing
> this patch.
Because fmin and fmax treat NaNs as missing data. But you have to be
careful with SNaNs here, probably just skip most of this when
-fsignaling-nans is used. It also still needs -fno-signed-zeros btw,
but not full -ffast-math indeed.
Segher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-07 20:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-18 8:52 [PATCH v3, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605] HAO CHEN GUI
2022-05-30 1:24 ` Ping " HAO CHEN GUI
2022-05-30 9:56 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-06-01 21:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-06-07 1:51 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2022-06-07 20:44 ` Segher Boessenkool
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).