public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: law@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] middle-end/93519 - avoid folding stmts in obviously unreachable code
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 21:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <738fbdc2-9782-fee5-d886-1f62450527d2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2002061552210.18835@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

On 2/6/20 7:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> The inliner folds stmts delayed, the following arranges things so
> to not fold stmts that are obviously not reachable to avoid warnings
> from those code regions.
> 
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

It fixes the reported problem so it works for me.

The tests I submitted with my patch fail a number of cases because
along with strcpy it also deferred folding overlapping mempcpy calls.
That was not strictly part of the regression so I'm okay with deferring
it until GCC 11.  I will resubmit an updated patch to defer the folding
then.

Thanks
Martin

> OK?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard.
> 
> 2020-02-06  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
> 
> 	PR middle-end/93519
> 	* tree-inline.c (fold_marked_statements): Do a PRE walk,
> 	skipping unreachable regions.
> 	(optimize_inline_calls): Skip folding stmts when we didn't
> 	inline.
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/Wrestrict-21.c: New testcase.
> ---
>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wrestrict-21.c |  18 +++
>   gcc/tree-inline.c                   | 195 ++++++++++++++++------------
>   2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wrestrict-21.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wrestrict-21.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wrestrict-21.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..e300663758e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wrestrict-21.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -Wrestrict" } */
> +
> +static char *
> +str_numth(char *dest, char *num, int type)
> +{
> +  if (dest != num)
> +    __builtin_strcpy(dest, num); /* { dg-bogus "is the same" } */
> +  __builtin_strcat(dest, "foo");
> +  return dest;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +DCH_to_char(char *in, char *out, int collid)
> +{
> +  char *s = out;
> +  str_numth(s, s, 42);
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-inline.c b/gcc/tree-inline.c
> index 5b0050a53d2..19154bb843e 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-inline.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-inline.c
> @@ -5261,86 +5261,118 @@ static void
>   fold_marked_statements (int first, hash_set<gimple *> *statements)
>   {
>     auto_bitmap to_purge;
> -  for (; first < last_basic_block_for_fn (cfun); first++)
> -    if (BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, first))
> -      {
> -        gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
>   
> -	for (gsi = gsi_start_bb (BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, first));
> -	     !gsi_end_p (gsi);
> -	     gsi_next (&gsi))
> -	  if (statements->contains (gsi_stmt (gsi)))
> -	    {
> -	      gimple *old_stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> -	      tree old_decl
> -		= is_gimple_call (old_stmt) ? gimple_call_fndecl (old_stmt) : 0;
> +  auto_vec<edge_iterator, 20> stack (n_basic_blocks_for_fn (cfun) + 2);
> +  auto_sbitmap visited (last_basic_block_for_fn (cfun));
> +  bitmap_clear (visited);
> +
> +  stack.quick_push (ei_start (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun)->succs));
> +  while (!stack.is_empty ())
> +    {
> +      /* Look at the edge on the top of the stack.  */
> +      edge_iterator ei = stack.last ();
> +      basic_block dest = ei_edge (ei)->dest;
> +      edge known_taken;
> +
> +      if (dest != EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun)
> +	  && !bitmap_bit_p (visited, dest->index)
> +	  /* Avoid walking unreachable edges, the iteration scheme
> +	     using edge iterators doesn't allow to not push them so
> +	     ignore them here instead (FIXME: use an edge flag at least?).  */
> +	  && !((known_taken = find_taken_edge (ei_edge (ei)->src, NULL_TREE))
> +	       && known_taken != ei_edge (ei)))
> +	{
> +	  bitmap_set_bit (visited, dest->index);
>   
> -	      if (old_decl && fndecl_built_in_p (old_decl))
> -		{
> -		  /* Folding builtins can create multiple instructions,
> -		     we need to look at all of them.  */
> -		  gimple_stmt_iterator i2 = gsi;
> -		  gsi_prev (&i2);
> -		  if (fold_stmt (&gsi))
> -		    {
> -		      gimple *new_stmt;
> -		      /* If a builtin at the end of a bb folded into nothing,
> -			 the following loop won't work.  */
> -		      if (gsi_end_p (gsi))
> -			{
> -			  cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt (old_stmt,
> -							     old_decl, NULL);
> -			  break;
> -			}
> -		      if (gsi_end_p (i2))
> -			i2 = gsi_start_bb (BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, first));
> -		      else
> -			gsi_next (&i2);
> -		      while (1)
> -			{
> -			  new_stmt = gsi_stmt (i2);
> -			  update_stmt (new_stmt);
> -			  cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt (old_stmt, old_decl,
> -							     new_stmt);
> +	  if (dest->index >= first)
> +	    for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_bb (dest);
> +		 !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
> +	      {
> +		if (!statements->contains (gsi_stmt (gsi)))
> +		  continue;
>   
> -			  if (new_stmt == gsi_stmt (gsi))
> -			    {
> -			      /* It is okay to check only for the very last
> -				 of these statements.  If it is a throwing
> -				 statement nothing will change.  If it isn't
> -				 this can remove EH edges.  If that weren't
> -				 correct then because some intermediate stmts
> -				 throw, but not the last one.  That would mean
> -				 we'd have to split the block, which we can't
> -				 here and we'd loose anyway.  And as builtins
> -				 probably never throw, this all
> -				 is mood anyway.  */
> -			      if (maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (old_stmt,
> -								  new_stmt))
> -				bitmap_set_bit (to_purge, first);
> -			      break;
> -			    }
> +		gimple *old_stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> +		tree old_decl = (is_gimple_call (old_stmt)
> +				 ? gimple_call_fndecl (old_stmt) : 0);
> +		if (old_decl && fndecl_built_in_p (old_decl))
> +		  {
> +		    /* Folding builtins can create multiple instructions,
> +		       we need to look at all of them.  */
> +		    gimple_stmt_iterator i2 = gsi;
> +		    gsi_prev (&i2);
> +		    if (fold_stmt (&gsi))
> +		      {
> +			gimple *new_stmt;
> +			/* If a builtin at the end of a bb folded into nothing,
> +			   the following loop won't work.  */
> +			if (gsi_end_p (gsi))
> +			  {
> +			    cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt (old_stmt,
> +							       old_decl, NULL);
> +			    break;
> +			  }
> +			if (gsi_end_p (i2))
> +			  i2 = gsi_start_bb (dest);
> +			else
>   			  gsi_next (&i2);
> -			}
> -		    }
> -		}
> -	      else if (fold_stmt (&gsi))
> -		{
> -		  /* Re-read the statement from GSI as fold_stmt() may
> -		     have changed it.  */
> -		  gimple *new_stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> -		  update_stmt (new_stmt);
> -
> -		  if (is_gimple_call (old_stmt)
> -		      || is_gimple_call (new_stmt))
> -		    cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt (old_stmt, old_decl,
> -						       new_stmt);
> -
> -		  if (maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (old_stmt, new_stmt))
> -		    bitmap_set_bit (to_purge, first);
> -		}
> -	    }
> -      }
> +			while (1)
> +			  {
> +			    new_stmt = gsi_stmt (i2);
> +			    update_stmt (new_stmt);
> +			    cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt (old_stmt,
> +							       old_decl,
> +							       new_stmt);
> +
> +			    if (new_stmt == gsi_stmt (gsi))
> +			      {
> +				/* It is okay to check only for the very last
> +				   of these statements.  If it is a throwing
> +				   statement nothing will change.  If it isn't
> +				   this can remove EH edges.  If that weren't
> +				   correct then because some intermediate stmts
> +				   throw, but not the last one.  That would mean
> +				   we'd have to split the block, which we can't
> +				   here and we'd loose anyway.  And as builtins
> +				   probably never throw, this all
> +				   is mood anyway.  */
> +				if (maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (old_stmt,
> +								    new_stmt))
> +				  bitmap_set_bit (to_purge, dest->index);
> +				break;
> +			      }
> +			    gsi_next (&i2);
> +			  }
> +		      }
> +		  }
> +		else if (fold_stmt (&gsi))
> +		  {
> +		    /* Re-read the statement from GSI as fold_stmt() may
> +		       have changed it.  */
> +		    gimple *new_stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> +		    update_stmt (new_stmt);
> +
> +		    if (is_gimple_call (old_stmt)
> +			|| is_gimple_call (new_stmt))
> +		      cgraph_update_edges_for_call_stmt (old_stmt, old_decl,
> +							 new_stmt);
> +
> +		    if (maybe_clean_or_replace_eh_stmt (old_stmt, new_stmt))
> +		      bitmap_set_bit (to_purge, dest->index);
> +		  }
> +	      }
> +
> +	  if (EDGE_COUNT (dest->succs) > 0)
> +	    stack.quick_push (ei_start (dest->succs));
> +	}
> +      else
> +	{
> +	  if (!ei_one_before_end_p (ei))
> +	    ei_next (&stack.last ());
> +	  else
> +	    stack.pop ();
> +	}
> +    }
> +
>     gimple_purge_all_dead_eh_edges (to_purge);
>   }
>   
> @@ -5404,6 +5436,13 @@ optimize_inline_calls (tree fn)
>   	gcc_assert (e->inline_failed);
>       }
>   
> +  /* If we didn't inline into the function there is nothing to do.  */
> +  if (!inlined_p)
> +    {
> +      delete id.statements_to_fold;
> +      return 0;
> +    }
> +
>     /* Fold queued statements.  */
>     update_max_bb_count ();
>     fold_marked_statements (last, id.statements_to_fold);
> @@ -5426,10 +5465,6 @@ optimize_inline_calls (tree fn)
>   
>     gcc_assert (!id.debug_stmts.exists ());
>   
> -  /* If we didn't inline into the function there is nothing to do.  */
> -  if (!inlined_p)
> -    return 0;
> -
>     /* Renumber the lexical scoping (non-code) blocks consecutively.  */
>     number_blocks (fn);
>   
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-06 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-06 14:52 Richard Biener
2020-02-06 21:24 ` Martin Sebor [this message]
2020-02-07 11:56   ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=738fbdc2-9782-fee5-d886-1f62450527d2@gmail.com \
    --to=msebor@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).