From: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LTO: fallback to -flto=N if -flto=jobserver does not work.
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:30:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73eaf32c-3776-9345-ec5f-57d43e94ecfe@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2h-5RJZOUctPV-xJFSA6g+mz0jPQiNxUK7y8sBDavB7Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4397 bytes --]
On 4/22/21 2:47 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 2:21 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/22/21 1:19 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:02 AM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/22/21 10:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:08 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When -flto=jobserver is used and we cannot detect job server, then we can
>>>>>> still fallbackto -flto=N mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ready to be installed?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this behavior needs to be documented - it falls back to a less
>>>>> conservative (possibly system overloading) mode - which IMHO is
>>>>> non-obvious and IMHO we shouldn't do.
>>>>
>>>> Sure, I'm sending corresponding patch. Note that it's quite common mistake
>>>> that '+' is missing in Makefile rule. That was motivation for my change.
>>>
>>> Sure, but that change won't get this fixed.
>>
>> It will as linker command line will contain (-flto=jobserver) and LTO will fallback to -flto=N.
>>
>>> IMHO we should eventually
>>> emit diagnostic like
>>>
>>> warning: could not find jobserver, compiling N jobs serially
>>>
>>> once N > 1 (or 2?).
>>
>> We do that now (for all N):
>> lto-wrapper: warning: jobserver is not available: ‘MAKEFLAGS’ environment variable is unset
>>
>>
>>> Likewise if people just use -flto and auto-detection
>>> finds nothing:
>>
>> -flto != -flto=auto
>>
>> Yes, -flto is a serial linking and we can emit a warning.
>
> I'd avoid warning if there's just a single ltrans unit.
That's doable and I've just done that in the attached patch.
Two disadvantages:
- one needs waiting for the warning after WPA
- source change (>1 LTRANS) can trigger the warning
>
>>> warning: using serial compilation of N LTRANS jobs
>>> note: refer to http://.... for how to use parallel compile
>>>
>>> using the URL diagnostics to point to -flto=... documentation.
>>
>> What about making that a proper warning (-Wlto)? We have diagnostics infrastructure
>> that prints URL links.
>
> Note that drivers like lto-wrapper do not have fully initialized diagnostic
> machinery and use a "different" set of overloads (likewise gen* programs).
I managed printing the warning:
lto-wrapper: warning: jobserver is not available: ‘MAKEFLAGS’ environment variable is unset
lto-wrapper: note: see the ‘-flto’ option documentation for more information
and
lto-wrapper: warning: using serial compilation of 128 LTRANS jobs
lto-wrapper: note: see the ‘-flto’ option documentation for more information
>
>>>
>>> That is, teach users rather than second-guessing and eventually
>>> blowing things up. IMHO only the jobserver mode is safe to
>>> automatically use.
>>
>> Well, -flto=auto is also fine and document. I think there is no possibility
>> auto CPU deduction can fail. So -flto=jobserver (with missing make job server)
>> and -flto (equal to -flto=1) worth emitting a warning.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Yes, that sounds reasonable. I suspect that people might want to see
> -flto default to -flto=auto but then I don't think that's good because there's
> no system wide job scheduler limiting things (systemd-jobserver anyone?)
Done that.
Thoughts?
Martin
>
> Richard.
>
>> Martin
>>
>>>
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * lto-wrapper.c (run_gcc): When -flto=jobserver is used, but the
>>>>>> makeserver cannot be detected, then use -flto=N fallback.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> gcc/lto-wrapper.c | 3 ++-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/gcc/lto-wrapper.c b/gcc/lto-wrapper.c
>>>>>> index 03a5922f8ea..0b626d7c811 100644
>>>>>> --- a/gcc/lto-wrapper.c
>>>>>> +++ b/gcc/lto-wrapper.c
>>>>>> @@ -1585,8 +1585,9 @@ run_gcc (unsigned argc, char *argv[])
>>>>>> if (jobserver && jobserver_error != NULL)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> warning (0, jobserver_error);
>>>>>> - parallel = 0;
>>>>>> + /* Fall back to auto parallelism. */
>>>>>> jobserver = 0;
>>>>>> + auto_parallel = 1;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> else if (!jobserver && jobserver_error == NULL)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.31.1
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Print-warning-diagnostics-for-flto-issues.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4042 bytes --]
From 7cd89e17c49c027027e2aed1722c0758331ac7ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:27:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Print warning diagnostics for -flto issues.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* lto-wrapper.c (print_lto_docs_link): New function.
(run_gcc): Print warning about missing job server detection
after we know NR of partitions. Do the same for -flto{,=1}.
* opts.c (get_option_html_page): Support -flto option.
---
gcc/lto-wrapper.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
gcc/opts.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/lto-wrapper.c b/gcc/lto-wrapper.c
index 0b626d7c811..f7ca084ef6c 100644
--- a/gcc/lto-wrapper.c
+++ b/gcc/lto-wrapper.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
#include "simple-object.h"
#include "lto-section-names.h"
#include "collect-utils.h"
+#include "opts-diagnostic.h"
/* Environment variable, used for passing the names of offload targets from GCC
driver to lto-wrapper. */
@@ -1335,6 +1336,23 @@ jobserver_active_p (void)
return JS_PREFIX "cannot access %<" JS_NEEDLE "%> file descriptors";
}
+/* Print link to -flto documentation with a hint message. */
+
+void
+print_lto_docs_link ()
+{
+ const char *url = get_option_url (NULL, OPT_flto);
+
+ pretty_printer pp;
+ pp.url_format = URL_FORMAT_DEFAULT;
+ pp_string (&pp, "see the ");
+ pp_begin_url (&pp, url);
+ pp_string (&pp, "%<-flto%> option documentation");
+ pp_end_url (&pp);
+ pp_string (&pp, " for more information");
+ inform (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, pp_formatted_text (&pp));
+}
+
/* Test that a make command is present and working, return true if so. */
static bool
@@ -1369,8 +1387,10 @@ run_gcc (unsigned argc, char *argv[])
char *collect_gcc_options;
int parallel = 0;
int jobserver = 0;
+ bool jobserver_requested = false;
int auto_parallel = 0;
bool no_partition = false;
+ const char *jobserver_error = NULL;
struct cl_decoded_option *fdecoded_options = NULL;
struct cl_decoded_option *offload_fdecoded_options = NULL;
unsigned int fdecoded_options_count = 0;
@@ -1522,6 +1542,7 @@ run_gcc (unsigned argc, char *argv[])
{
parallel = 1;
jobserver = 1;
+ jobserver_requested = true;
}
else if (strcmp (option->arg, "auto") == 0)
{
@@ -1576,15 +1597,15 @@ run_gcc (unsigned argc, char *argv[])
{
lto_mode = LTO_MODE_LTO;
jobserver = 0;
+ jobserver_requested = false;
auto_parallel = 0;
parallel = 0;
}
else
{
- const char *jobserver_error = jobserver_active_p ();
+ jobserver_error = jobserver_active_p ();
if (jobserver && jobserver_error != NULL)
{
- warning (0, jobserver_error);
/* Fall back to auto parallelism. */
jobserver = 0;
auto_parallel = 1;
@@ -1904,6 +1925,20 @@ cont:
maybe_unlink (ltrans_output_file);
ltrans_output_file = NULL;
+ if (nr > 1)
+ {
+ if (jobserver_requested && jobserver_error != NULL)
+ {
+ warning (0, jobserver_error);
+ print_lto_docs_link ();
+ }
+ else if (parallel == 0)
+ {
+ warning (0, "using serial compilation of %d LTRANS jobs", nr);
+ print_lto_docs_link ();
+ }
+ }
+
if (parallel)
{
makefile = make_temp_file (".mk");
diff --git a/gcc/opts.c b/gcc/opts.c
index 24bb64198c8..fe6fddbf095 100644
--- a/gcc/opts.c
+++ b/gcc/opts.c
@@ -3243,9 +3243,13 @@ get_option_html_page (int option_index)
const cl_option *cl_opt = &cl_options[option_index];
/* Analyzer options are on their own page. */
- if (strstr(cl_opt->opt_text, "analyzer-"))
+ if (strstr (cl_opt->opt_text, "analyzer-"))
return "gcc/Static-Analyzer-Options.html";
+ /* Handle -flto= option. */
+ if (strstr (cl_opt->opt_text, "flto"))
+ return "gcc/Optimize-Options.html";
+
#ifdef CL_Fortran
if ((cl_opt->flags & CL_Fortran) != 0
/* If it is option common to both C/C++ and Fortran, it is documented
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 11:50 Martin Liška
2021-04-21 15:11 ` Jeff Law
2021-04-22 8:04 ` Richard Biener
2021-04-22 9:02 ` Martin Liška
2021-04-22 11:19 ` Richard Biener
2021-04-22 12:21 ` Martin Liška
2021-04-22 12:47 ` Richard Biener
2021-04-22 14:30 ` Martin Liška [this message]
2021-05-12 9:10 ` Martin Liška
2021-05-12 9:21 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73eaf32c-3776-9345-ec5f-57d43e94ecfe@suse.cz \
--to=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).