public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] VEC_COND_EXPR: fix ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr
@ 2020-08-28 14:18 Martin Liška
  2020-08-31  8:01 ` Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Liška @ 2020-08-28 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

Hey.

The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.

Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.

Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR tree-optimization/96466
	* gimple-fold.c (expand_cmp_piecewise): New.
	* gimple-fold.h (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): New.
	(expand_cmp_piecewise): Moved from ...
	* tree-vect-generic.c (expand_vector_comparison): ... here.
	(nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): Moved to gimple-fold.h.
	* gimple-isel.cc (gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr): Use
	expand_cmp_piecewise fallback for constants.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR tree-optimization/96466
	* gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c: New test.
---
  gcc/gimple-fold.c                   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++
  gcc/gimple-fold.h                   | 14 ++++++++++
  gcc/gimple-isel.cc                  | 10 ++++---
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c | 18 +++++++++++++
  gcc/tree-vect-generic.c             | 41 ++---------------------------
  5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
index dcc1b56a273..86d5d0ed7d8 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c
+++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
@@ -8056,3 +8056,31 @@ gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *stmt, int depth)
        return false;
      }
  }
+
+tree
+expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0, tree op1)
+{
+  tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
+  tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
+  tree index = bitsize_int (0);
+  int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
+  int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
+  tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
+  tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
+  int i;
+  tree t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
+
+  if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
+    ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
+  for (i = 0; i < nunits;
+       i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
+    {
+      tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width, index);
+      tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width, index);
+      tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, NE_EXPR, ret_inner_type, a, b);
+      t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
+			   bitsize_int (i));
+    }
+
+  return gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.h b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
index 0ed1d1ffe83..7e843b34f53 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-fold.h
+++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
@@ -147,6 +147,20 @@ gimple_build_vector (gimple_seq *seq, tree_vector_builder *builder)
  extern bool gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (gimple *, bool *, int = 0);
  extern bool gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *, int = 0);
  
+/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
+   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
+   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
+   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
+
+static inline unsigned int
+nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
+{
+  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
+}
+
+extern tree expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree lhs,
+				  tree op0, tree op1);
+
  /* In gimple-match.c.  */
  extern tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
  			     gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
index b330cf4c20e..32e3bc31f7f 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
  #include "gimplify-me.h"
  #include "gimplify.h"
  #include "tree-cfg.h"
-#include "bitmap.h"
  #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
+#include "gimple-fold.h"
  
  /* Expand all VEC_COND_EXPR gimple assignments into calls to internal
     function based on type of selected expansion.  */
@@ -119,8 +119,12 @@ gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
        /* Fake op0 < 0.  */
        else
  	{
-	  gcc_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
-		      == MODE_VECTOR_INT);
+	  if (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0))) != MODE_VECTOR_INT)
+	    {
+	      tree t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, TREE_TYPE (lhs), op0, op1);
+	      return gimple_build_assign (lhs, NOP_EXPR, t);
+	    }
+
  	  op0a = op0;
  	  op0b = build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (op0));
  	  tcode = LT_EXPR;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8cca5e12ff2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/96466 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Og -finline-functions-called-once -fno-tree-ccp" } */
+
+typedef unsigned long __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8))) V;
+
+V
+bar (unsigned long x, V v)
+{
+  v &= x >= v;
+  return (V) v;
+}
+
+V
+foo (void)
+{
+  return bar (5, (V) 4441221375);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
index 6d5d65195ae..b01aa301baa 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
@@ -42,20 +42,11 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
  #include "insn-config.h"
  #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
  #include "recog.h"		/* FIXME: for insn_data */
+#include "gimple-fold.h"
  
  
  static void expand_vector_operations_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *, bitmap);
  
-/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
-   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
-   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
-   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
-static unsigned int
-nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
-{
-  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
-}
-
  /* Return true if TYPE1 has more elements than TYPE2, where either
     type may be a vector or a scalar.  */
  
@@ -427,35 +418,7 @@ expand_vector_comparison (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0,
  		       TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type)
  		       * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE
  						(TREE_TYPE (type)))))
-	{
-	  tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
-	  tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
-	  tree index = bitsize_int (0);
-	  int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
-	  int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
-	  tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
-	  tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
-	  int i;
-	  location_t loc = gimple_location (gsi_stmt (*gsi));
-	  t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
-
-	  if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
-	    ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
-	  warning_at (loc, OPT_Wvector_operation_performance,
-		      "vector operation will be expanded piecewise");
-	  for (i = 0; i < nunits;
-	       i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
-	    {
-	      tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width,
-					 index);
-	      tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width,
-					 index);
-	      tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, ret_inner_type, a, b);
-	      t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
-				   bitsize_int (i));
-	    }
-	  t = gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
-	}
+	t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, type, op0, op1);
        else
  	t = expand_vector_piecewise (gsi, do_compare, type,
  				     TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0)), op0, op1,
-- 
2.28.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] VEC_COND_EXPR: fix ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr
  2020-08-28 14:18 [PATCH] VEC_COND_EXPR: fix ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr Martin Liška
@ 2020-08-31  8:01 ` Richard Biener
  2020-09-01 14:27   ` Martin Liška
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2020-08-31  8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Liška; +Cc: GCC Patches

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Hey.
>
> The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
> that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?

Err, no - we shouldn't do this at RTL expansion time.  And piecewise
expansion is gross - in this the case is a constant boolean vector IIRC
(not sure what mode?) and ISEL only tries matching up with
a comparison operand.  But ISEL should also handle matching up with
a constant "boolean vector" ("boolean vector"s are artifacts of VEC_COND_EXPRs,
but some targets allow bitwise arithmetic on them...).  So the compensation
needs to happen in ISEL, recognizing

 _1 = {0}
 _2 = _1 ? ...;

as

 _2 = .VCOND (0 == 0, ...)

or so.

Richard.

> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR tree-optimization/96466
>         * gimple-fold.c (expand_cmp_piecewise): New.
>         * gimple-fold.h (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): New.
>         (expand_cmp_piecewise): Moved from ...
>         * tree-vect-generic.c (expand_vector_comparison): ... here.
>         (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): Moved to gimple-fold.h.
>         * gimple-isel.cc (gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr): Use
>         expand_cmp_piecewise fallback for constants.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR tree-optimization/96466
>         * gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c: New test.
> ---
>   gcc/gimple-fold.c                   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   gcc/gimple-fold.h                   | 14 ++++++++++
>   gcc/gimple-isel.cc                  | 10 ++++---
>   gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c | 18 +++++++++++++
>   gcc/tree-vect-generic.c             | 41 ++---------------------------
>   5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
> index dcc1b56a273..86d5d0ed7d8 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
> @@ -8056,3 +8056,31 @@ gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *stmt, int depth)
>         return false;
>       }
>   }
> +
> +tree
> +expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0, tree op1)
> +{
> +  tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> +  tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> +  tree index = bitsize_int (0);
> +  int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> +  int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
> +  tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
> +  tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
> +  int i;
> +  tree t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
> +
> +  if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
> +    ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
> +  for (i = 0; i < nunits;
> +       i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
> +    {
> +      tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width, index);
> +      tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width, index);
> +      tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, NE_EXPR, ret_inner_type, a, b);
> +      t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
> +                          bitsize_int (i));
> +    }
> +
> +  return gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.h b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
> index 0ed1d1ffe83..7e843b34f53 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.h
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,20 @@ gimple_build_vector (gimple_seq *seq, tree_vector_builder *builder)
>   extern bool gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (gimple *, bool *, int = 0);
>   extern bool gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *, int = 0);
>
> +/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
> +   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
> +   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
> +   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
> +
> +static inline unsigned int
> +nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
> +{
> +  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
> +}
> +
> +extern tree expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree lhs,
> +                                 tree op0, tree op1);
> +
>   /* In gimple-match.c.  */
>   extern tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
>                              gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
> index b330cf4c20e..32e3bc31f7f 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>   #include "gimplify-me.h"
>   #include "gimplify.h"
>   #include "tree-cfg.h"
> -#include "bitmap.h"
>   #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
> +#include "gimple-fold.h"
>
>   /* Expand all VEC_COND_EXPR gimple assignments into calls to internal
>      function based on type of selected expansion.  */
> @@ -119,8 +119,12 @@ gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
>         /* Fake op0 < 0.  */
>         else
>         {
> -         gcc_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
> -                     == MODE_VECTOR_INT);
> +         if (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0))) != MODE_VECTOR_INT)
> +           {
> +             tree t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, TREE_TYPE (lhs), op0, op1);
> +             return gimple_build_assign (lhs, NOP_EXPR, t);
> +           }
> +
>           op0a = op0;
>           op0b = build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>           tcode = LT_EXPR;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..8cca5e12ff2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/96466 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-Og -finline-functions-called-once -fno-tree-ccp" } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned long __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8))) V;
> +
> +V
> +bar (unsigned long x, V v)
> +{
> +  v &= x >= v;
> +  return (V) v;
> +}
> +
> +V
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  return bar (5, (V) 4441221375);
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
> index 6d5d65195ae..b01aa301baa 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
> @@ -42,20 +42,11 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>   #include "insn-config.h"
>   #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
>   #include "recog.h"            /* FIXME: for insn_data */
> +#include "gimple-fold.h"
>
>
>   static void expand_vector_operations_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *, bitmap);
>
> -/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
> -   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
> -   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
> -   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
> -static unsigned int
> -nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
> -{
> -  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
> -}
> -
>   /* Return true if TYPE1 has more elements than TYPE2, where either
>      type may be a vector or a scalar.  */
>
> @@ -427,35 +418,7 @@ expand_vector_comparison (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0,
>                        TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type)
>                        * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE
>                                                 (TREE_TYPE (type)))))
> -       {
> -         tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> -         tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> -         tree index = bitsize_int (0);
> -         int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> -         int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
> -         tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
> -         tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
> -         int i;
> -         location_t loc = gimple_location (gsi_stmt (*gsi));
> -         t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
> -
> -         if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
> -           ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
> -         warning_at (loc, OPT_Wvector_operation_performance,
> -                     "vector operation will be expanded piecewise");
> -         for (i = 0; i < nunits;
> -              i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
> -           {
> -             tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width,
> -                                        index);
> -             tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width,
> -                                        index);
> -             tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, ret_inner_type, a, b);
> -             t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
> -                                  bitsize_int (i));
> -           }
> -         t = gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
> -       }
> +       t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, type, op0, op1);
>         else
>         t = expand_vector_piecewise (gsi, do_compare, type,
>                                      TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0)), op0, op1,
> --
> 2.28.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] VEC_COND_EXPR: fix ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr
  2020-08-31  8:01 ` Richard Biener
@ 2020-09-01 14:27   ` Martin Liška
  2020-09-22 11:28     ` Martin Liška
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Liška @ 2020-09-01 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Biener; +Cc: GCC Patches

On 8/31/20 10:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> Hey.
>>
>> The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
>> that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>>
>> Ready to be installed?
> 
> Err, no - we shouldn't do this at RTL expansion time.  And piecewise
> expansion is gross - in this the case is a constant boolean vector IIRC
> (not sure what mode?)

Yes, it's:

(gdb) p op0.typed.type
$11 = <vector_type 0x7ffff743a1f8>
(gdb) p mode
$13 = E_DImode

and TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)) is E_BLKmode

> and ISEL only tries matching up with
> a comparison operand.  But ISEL should also handle matching up with
> a constant "boolean vector" ("boolean vector"s are artifacts of VEC_COND_EXPRs,
> but some targets allow bitwise arithmetic on them...).  So the compensation
> needs to happen in ISEL, recognizing
> 
>   _1 = {0}
>   _2 = _1 ? ...;
> 
> as
> 
>   _2 = .VCOND (0 == 0, ...)

Do we really want to do a scalar arguments of .VCOND? Note that in PR96453
(a similar bug), we end up with:

   _5 = { -1, -1 };
   _6 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_5, { -1, -1 }, { 0, 0 }>;

Thanks for hints,
Martin

> 
> or so.
> 
> Richard.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>>          PR tree-optimization/96466
>>          * gimple-fold.c (expand_cmp_piecewise): New.
>>          * gimple-fold.h (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): New.
>>          (expand_cmp_piecewise): Moved from ...
>>          * tree-vect-generic.c (expand_vector_comparison): ... here.
>>          (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): Moved to gimple-fold.h.
>>          * gimple-isel.cc (gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr): Use
>>          expand_cmp_piecewise fallback for constants.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>>          PR tree-optimization/96466
>>          * gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c: New test.
>> ---
>>    gcc/gimple-fold.c                   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>    gcc/gimple-fold.h                   | 14 ++++++++++
>>    gcc/gimple-isel.cc                  | 10 ++++---
>>    gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c | 18 +++++++++++++
>>    gcc/tree-vect-generic.c             | 41 ++---------------------------
>>    5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>    create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
>> index dcc1b56a273..86d5d0ed7d8 100644
>> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c
>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
>> @@ -8056,3 +8056,31 @@ gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *stmt, int depth)
>>          return false;
>>        }
>>    }
>> +
>> +tree
>> +expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0, tree op1)
>> +{
>> +  tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>> +  tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>> +  tree index = bitsize_int (0);
>> +  int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>> +  int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
>> +  tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
>> +  tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
>> +  int i;
>> +  tree t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
>> +
>> +  if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
>> +    ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
>> +  for (i = 0; i < nunits;
>> +       i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
>> +    {
>> +      tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width, index);
>> +      tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width, index);
>> +      tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, NE_EXPR, ret_inner_type, a, b);
>> +      t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
>> +                          bitsize_int (i));
>> +    }
>> +
>> +  return gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.h b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
>> index 0ed1d1ffe83..7e843b34f53 100644
>> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.h
>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
>> @@ -147,6 +147,20 @@ gimple_build_vector (gimple_seq *seq, tree_vector_builder *builder)
>>    extern bool gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (gimple *, bool *, int = 0);
>>    extern bool gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *, int = 0);
>>
>> +/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
>> +   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
>> +   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
>> +   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
>> +
>> +static inline unsigned int
>> +nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
>> +{
>> +  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
>> +}
>> +
>> +extern tree expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree lhs,
>> +                                 tree op0, tree op1);
>> +
>>    /* In gimple-match.c.  */
>>    extern tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
>>                               gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
>> index b330cf4c20e..32e3bc31f7f 100644
>> --- a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
>> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>    #include "gimplify-me.h"
>>    #include "gimplify.h"
>>    #include "tree-cfg.h"
>> -#include "bitmap.h"
>>    #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
>> +#include "gimple-fold.h"
>>
>>    /* Expand all VEC_COND_EXPR gimple assignments into calls to internal
>>       function based on type of selected expansion.  */
>> @@ -119,8 +119,12 @@ gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
>>          /* Fake op0 < 0.  */
>>          else
>>          {
>> -         gcc_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
>> -                     == MODE_VECTOR_INT);
>> +         if (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0))) != MODE_VECTOR_INT)
>> +           {
>> +             tree t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, TREE_TYPE (lhs), op0, op1);
>> +             return gimple_build_assign (lhs, NOP_EXPR, t);
>> +           }
>> +
>>            op0a = op0;
>>            op0b = build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>>            tcode = LT_EXPR;
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..8cca5e12ff2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>> +/* PR tree-optimization/96466 */
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-Og -finline-functions-called-once -fno-tree-ccp" } */
>> +
>> +typedef unsigned long __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8))) V;
>> +
>> +V
>> +bar (unsigned long x, V v)
>> +{
>> +  v &= x >= v;
>> +  return (V) v;
>> +}
>> +
>> +V
>> +foo (void)
>> +{
>> +  return bar (5, (V) 4441221375);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
>> index 6d5d65195ae..b01aa301baa 100644
>> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
>> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
>> @@ -42,20 +42,11 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>    #include "insn-config.h"
>>    #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
>>    #include "recog.h"            /* FIXME: for insn_data */
>> +#include "gimple-fold.h"
>>
>>
>>    static void expand_vector_operations_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *, bitmap);
>>
>> -/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
>> -   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
>> -   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
>> -   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
>> -static unsigned int
>> -nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
>> -{
>> -  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
>> -}
>> -
>>    /* Return true if TYPE1 has more elements than TYPE2, where either
>>       type may be a vector or a scalar.  */
>>
>> @@ -427,35 +418,7 @@ expand_vector_comparison (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0,
>>                         TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type)
>>                         * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE
>>                                                  (TREE_TYPE (type)))))
>> -       {
>> -         tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>> -         tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>> -         tree index = bitsize_int (0);
>> -         int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>> -         int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
>> -         tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
>> -         tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
>> -         int i;
>> -         location_t loc = gimple_location (gsi_stmt (*gsi));
>> -         t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
>> -
>> -         if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
>> -           ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
>> -         warning_at (loc, OPT_Wvector_operation_performance,
>> -                     "vector operation will be expanded piecewise");
>> -         for (i = 0; i < nunits;
>> -              i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
>> -           {
>> -             tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width,
>> -                                        index);
>> -             tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width,
>> -                                        index);
>> -             tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, ret_inner_type, a, b);
>> -             t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
>> -                                  bitsize_int (i));
>> -           }
>> -         t = gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
>> -       }
>> +       t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, type, op0, op1);
>>          else
>>          t = expand_vector_piecewise (gsi, do_compare, type,
>>                                       TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0)), op0, op1,
>> --
>> 2.28.0
>>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] VEC_COND_EXPR: fix ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr
  2020-09-01 14:27   ` Martin Liška
@ 2020-09-22 11:28     ` Martin Liška
  2020-09-23 12:26       ` Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Liška @ 2020-09-22 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Biener; +Cc: GCC Patches

@Richi: May I please ping this?

On 9/1/20 4:27 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 8/31/20 10:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey.
>>>
>>> The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
>>> that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.
>>>
>>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>>>
>>> Ready to be installed?
>>
>> Err, no - we shouldn't do this at RTL expansion time.  And piecewise
>> expansion is gross - in this the case is a constant boolean vector IIRC
>> (not sure what mode?)
> 
> Yes, it's:
> 
> (gdb) p op0.typed.type
> $11 = <vector_type 0x7ffff743a1f8>
> (gdb) p mode
> $13 = E_DImode
> 
> and TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)) is E_BLKmode
> 
>> and ISEL only tries matching up with
>> a comparison operand.  But ISEL should also handle matching up with
>> a constant "boolean vector" ("boolean vector"s are artifacts of VEC_COND_EXPRs,
>> but some targets allow bitwise arithmetic on them...).  So the compensation
>> needs to happen in ISEL, recognizing
>>
>>   _1 = {0}
>>   _2 = _1 ? ...;
>>
>> as
>>
>>   _2 = .VCOND (0 == 0, ...)
> 
> Do we really want to do a scalar arguments of .VCOND? Note that in PR96453
> (a similar bug), we end up with:
> 
>    _5 = { -1, -1 };
>    _6 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_5, { -1, -1 }, { 0, 0 }>;
> 
> Thanks for hints,
> Martin
> 
>>
>> or so.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>>          PR tree-optimization/96466
>>>          * gimple-fold.c (expand_cmp_piecewise): New.
>>>          * gimple-fold.h (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): New.
>>>          (expand_cmp_piecewise): Moved from ...
>>>          * tree-vect-generic.c (expand_vector_comparison): ... here.
>>>          (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): Moved to gimple-fold.h.
>>>          * gimple-isel.cc (gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr): Use
>>>          expand_cmp_piecewise fallback for constants.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>>          PR tree-optimization/96466
>>>          * gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c: New test.
>>> ---
>>>    gcc/gimple-fold.c                   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    gcc/gimple-fold.h                   | 14 ++++++++++
>>>    gcc/gimple-isel.cc                  | 10 ++++---
>>>    gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c | 18 +++++++++++++
>>>    gcc/tree-vect-generic.c             | 41 ++---------------------------
>>>    5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
>>> index dcc1b56a273..86d5d0ed7d8 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
>>> @@ -8056,3 +8056,31 @@ gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *stmt, int depth)
>>>          return false;
>>>        }
>>>    }
>>> +
>>> +tree
>>> +expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0, tree op1)
>>> +{
>>> +  tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>>> +  tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>>> +  tree index = bitsize_int (0);
>>> +  int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>>> +  int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
>>> +  tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
>>> +  tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
>>> +  int i;
>>> +  tree t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
>>> +
>>> +  if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
>>> +    ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
>>> +  for (i = 0; i < nunits;
>>> +       i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
>>> +    {
>>> +      tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width, index);
>>> +      tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width, index);
>>> +      tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, NE_EXPR, ret_inner_type, a, b);
>>> +      t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
>>> +                          bitsize_int (i));
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +  return gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.h b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
>>> index 0ed1d1ffe83..7e843b34f53 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.h
>>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
>>> @@ -147,6 +147,20 @@ gimple_build_vector (gimple_seq *seq, tree_vector_builder *builder)
>>>    extern bool gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (gimple *, bool *, int = 0);
>>>    extern bool gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *, int = 0);
>>>
>>> +/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
>>> +   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
>>> +   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
>>> +   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
>>> +
>>> +static inline unsigned int
>>> +nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
>>> +{
>>> +  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +extern tree expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree lhs,
>>> +                                 tree op0, tree op1);
>>> +
>>>    /* In gimple-match.c.  */
>>>    extern tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
>>>                               gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
>>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
>>> index b330cf4c20e..32e3bc31f7f 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
>>> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>>    #include "gimplify-me.h"
>>>    #include "gimplify.h"
>>>    #include "tree-cfg.h"
>>> -#include "bitmap.h"
>>>    #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
>>> +#include "gimple-fold.h"
>>>
>>>    /* Expand all VEC_COND_EXPR gimple assignments into calls to internal
>>>       function based on type of selected expansion.  */
>>> @@ -119,8 +119,12 @@ gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
>>>          /* Fake op0 < 0.  */
>>>          else
>>>          {
>>> -         gcc_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
>>> -                     == MODE_VECTOR_INT);
>>> +         if (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0))) != MODE_VECTOR_INT)
>>> +           {
>>> +             tree t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, TREE_TYPE (lhs), op0, op1);
>>> +             return gimple_build_assign (lhs, NOP_EXPR, t);
>>> +           }
>>> +
>>>            op0a = op0;
>>>            op0b = build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>>>            tcode = LT_EXPR;
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..8cca5e12ff2
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
>>> +/* PR tree-optimization/96466 */
>>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>>> +/* { dg-options "-Og -finline-functions-called-once -fno-tree-ccp" } */
>>> +
>>> +typedef unsigned long __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8))) V;
>>> +
>>> +V
>>> +bar (unsigned long x, V v)
>>> +{
>>> +  v &= x >= v;
>>> +  return (V) v;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +V
>>> +foo (void)
>>> +{
>>> +  return bar (5, (V) 4441221375);
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
>>> index 6d5d65195ae..b01aa301baa 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
>>> @@ -42,20 +42,11 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>>    #include "insn-config.h"
>>>    #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
>>>    #include "recog.h"            /* FIXME: for insn_data */
>>> +#include "gimple-fold.h"
>>>
>>>
>>>    static void expand_vector_operations_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *, bitmap);
>>>
>>> -/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
>>> -   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
>>> -   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
>>> -   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
>>> -static unsigned int
>>> -nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
>>> -{
>>> -  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>    /* Return true if TYPE1 has more elements than TYPE2, where either
>>>       type may be a vector or a scalar.  */
>>>
>>> @@ -427,35 +418,7 @@ expand_vector_comparison (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0,
>>>                         TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type)
>>>                         * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE
>>>                                                  (TREE_TYPE (type)))))
>>> -       {
>>> -         tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>>> -         tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>>> -         tree index = bitsize_int (0);
>>> -         int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
>>> -         int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
>>> -         tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
>>> -         tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
>>> -         int i;
>>> -         location_t loc = gimple_location (gsi_stmt (*gsi));
>>> -         t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
>>> -
>>> -         if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
>>> -           ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
>>> -         warning_at (loc, OPT_Wvector_operation_performance,
>>> -                     "vector operation will be expanded piecewise");
>>> -         for (i = 0; i < nunits;
>>> -              i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
>>> -           {
>>> -             tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width,
>>> -                                        index);
>>> -             tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width,
>>> -                                        index);
>>> -             tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, ret_inner_type, a, b);
>>> -             t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
>>> -                                  bitsize_int (i));
>>> -           }
>>> -         t = gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
>>> -       }
>>> +       t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, type, op0, op1);
>>>          else
>>>          t = expand_vector_piecewise (gsi, do_compare, type,
>>>                                       TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0)), op0, op1,
>>> -- 
>>> 2.28.0
>>>
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] VEC_COND_EXPR: fix ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr
  2020-09-22 11:28     ` Martin Liška
@ 2020-09-23 12:26       ` Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2020-09-23 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Liška; +Cc: GCC Patches

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 1:28 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> @Richi: May I please ping this?

I have commented in the PR and am testing a patch - other PRs may prevail.

Richard.

> On 9/1/20 4:27 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 8/31/20 10:01 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 4:18 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hey.
> >>>
> >>> The patch is about VEC_COND_EXP comparison of a SSA_NAME with a constant
> >>> that is artifact of -fno-tree-ccp.
> >>>
> >>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
> >>>
> >>> Ready to be installed?
> >>
> >> Err, no - we shouldn't do this at RTL expansion time.  And piecewise
> >> expansion is gross - in this the case is a constant boolean vector IIRC
> >> (not sure what mode?)
> >
> > Yes, it's:
> >
> > (gdb) p op0.typed.type
> > $11 = <vector_type 0x7ffff743a1f8>
> > (gdb) p mode
> > $13 = E_DImode
> >
> > and TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)) is E_BLKmode
> >
> >> and ISEL only tries matching up with
> >> a comparison operand.  But ISEL should also handle matching up with
> >> a constant "boolean vector" ("boolean vector"s are artifacts of VEC_COND_EXPRs,
> >> but some targets allow bitwise arithmetic on them...).  So the compensation
> >> needs to happen in ISEL, recognizing
> >>
> >>   _1 = {0}
> >>   _2 = _1 ? ...;
> >>
> >> as
> >>
> >>   _2 = .VCOND (0 == 0, ...)
> >
> > Do we really want to do a scalar arguments of .VCOND? Note that in PR96453
> > (a similar bug), we end up with:
> >
> >    _5 = { -1, -1 };
> >    _6 = VEC_COND_EXPR <_5, { -1, -1 }, { 0, 0 }>;
> >
> > Thanks for hints,
> > Martin
> >
> >>
> >> or so.
> >>
> >> Richard.
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>>
> >>>          PR tree-optimization/96466
> >>>          * gimple-fold.c (expand_cmp_piecewise): New.
> >>>          * gimple-fold.h (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): New.
> >>>          (expand_cmp_piecewise): Moved from ...
> >>>          * tree-vect-generic.c (expand_vector_comparison): ... here.
> >>>          (nunits_for_known_piecewise_op): Moved to gimple-fold.h.
> >>>          * gimple-isel.cc (gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr): Use
> >>>          expand_cmp_piecewise fallback for constants.
> >>>
> >>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >>>
> >>>          PR tree-optimization/96466
> >>>          * gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c: New test.
> >>> ---
> >>>    gcc/gimple-fold.c                   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>    gcc/gimple-fold.h                   | 14 ++++++++++
> >>>    gcc/gimple-isel.cc                  | 10 ++++---
> >>>    gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c | 18 +++++++++++++
> >>>    gcc/tree-vect-generic.c             | 41 ++---------------------------
> >>>    5 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >>>    create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
> >>> index dcc1b56a273..86d5d0ed7d8 100644
> >>> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c
> >>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c
> >>> @@ -8056,3 +8056,31 @@ gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *stmt, int depth)
> >>>          return false;
> >>>        }
> >>>    }
> >>> +
> >>> +tree
> >>> +expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0, tree op1)
> >>> +{
> >>> +  tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> >>> +  tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> >>> +  tree index = bitsize_int (0);
> >>> +  int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> >>> +  int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
> >>> +  tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
> >>> +  tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
> >>> +  int i;
> >>> +  tree t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
> >>> +
> >>> +  if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
> >>> +    ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
> >>> +  for (i = 0; i < nunits;
> >>> +       i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
> >>> +    {
> >>> +      tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width, index);
> >>> +      tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width, index);
> >>> +      tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, NE_EXPR, ret_inner_type, a, b);
> >>> +      t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
> >>> +                          bitsize_int (i));
> >>> +    }
> >>> +
> >>> +  return gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
> >>> +}
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.h b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
> >>> index 0ed1d1ffe83..7e843b34f53 100644
> >>> --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.h
> >>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.h
> >>> @@ -147,6 +147,20 @@ gimple_build_vector (gimple_seq *seq, tree_vector_builder *builder)
> >>>    extern bool gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p (gimple *, bool *, int = 0);
> >>>    extern bool gimple_stmt_integer_valued_real_p (gimple *, int = 0);
> >>>
> >>> +/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
> >>> +   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
> >>> +   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
> >>> +   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
> >>> +
> >>> +static inline unsigned int
> >>> +nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
> >>> +{
> >>> +  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +extern tree expand_cmp_piecewise (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree lhs,
> >>> +                                 tree op0, tree op1);
> >>> +
> >>>    /* In gimple-match.c.  */
> >>>    extern tree gimple_simplify (enum tree_code, tree, tree,
> >>>                               gimple_seq *, tree (*)(tree));
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
> >>> index b330cf4c20e..32e3bc31f7f 100644
> >>> --- a/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
> >>> +++ b/gcc/gimple-isel.cc
> >>> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
> >>>    #include "gimplify-me.h"
> >>>    #include "gimplify.h"
> >>>    #include "tree-cfg.h"
> >>> -#include "bitmap.h"
> >>>    #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
> >>> +#include "gimple-fold.h"
> >>>
> >>>    /* Expand all VEC_COND_EXPR gimple assignments into calls to internal
> >>>       function based on type of selected expansion.  */
> >>> @@ -119,8 +119,12 @@ gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
> >>>          /* Fake op0 < 0.  */
> >>>          else
> >>>          {
> >>> -         gcc_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
> >>> -                     == MODE_VECTOR_INT);
> >>> +         if (GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (op0))) != MODE_VECTOR_INT)
> >>> +           {
> >>> +             tree t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, TREE_TYPE (lhs), op0, op1);
> >>> +             return gimple_build_assign (lhs, NOP_EXPR, t);
> >>> +           }
> >>> +
> >>>            op0a = op0;
> >>>            op0b = build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> >>>            tcode = LT_EXPR;
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 00000000000..8cca5e12ff2
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr96466.c
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> >>> +/* PR tree-optimization/96466 */
> >>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> >>> +/* { dg-options "-Og -finline-functions-called-once -fno-tree-ccp" } */
> >>> +
> >>> +typedef unsigned long __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (8))) V;
> >>> +
> >>> +V
> >>> +bar (unsigned long x, V v)
> >>> +{
> >>> +  v &= x >= v;
> >>> +  return (V) v;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +V
> >>> +foo (void)
> >>> +{
> >>> +  return bar (5, (V) 4441221375);
> >>> +}
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
> >>> index 6d5d65195ae..b01aa301baa 100644
> >>> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
> >>> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-generic.c
> >>> @@ -42,20 +42,11 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
> >>>    #include "insn-config.h"
> >>>    #include "tree-ssa-dce.h"
> >>>    #include "recog.h"            /* FIXME: for insn_data */
> >>> +#include "gimple-fold.h"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>    static void expand_vector_operations_1 (gimple_stmt_iterator *, bitmap);
> >>>
> >>> -/* Return the number of elements in a vector type TYPE that we have
> >>> -   already decided needs to be expanded piecewise.  We don't support
> >>> -   this kind of expansion for variable-length vectors, since we should
> >>> -   always check for target support before introducing uses of those.  */
> >>> -static unsigned int
> >>> -nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (const_tree type)
> >>> -{
> >>> -  return TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type).to_constant ();
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>>    /* Return true if TYPE1 has more elements than TYPE2, where either
> >>>       type may be a vector or a scalar.  */
> >>>
> >>> @@ -427,35 +418,7 @@ expand_vector_comparison (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, tree type, tree op0,
> >>>                         TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type)
> >>>                         * GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE
> >>>                                                  (TREE_TYPE (type)))))
> >>> -       {
> >>> -         tree inner_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> >>> -         tree part_width = vector_element_bits_tree (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> >>> -         tree index = bitsize_int (0);
> >>> -         int nunits = nunits_for_known_piecewise_op (TREE_TYPE (op0));
> >>> -         int prec = GET_MODE_PRECISION (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (type));
> >>> -         tree ret_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (prec, 1);
> >>> -         tree ret_inner_type = boolean_type_node;
> >>> -         int i;
> >>> -         location_t loc = gimple_location (gsi_stmt (*gsi));
> >>> -         t = build_zero_cst (ret_type);
> >>> -
> >>> -         if (TYPE_PRECISION (ret_inner_type) != 1)
> >>> -           ret_inner_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (1, 1);
> >>> -         warning_at (loc, OPT_Wvector_operation_performance,
> >>> -                     "vector operation will be expanded piecewise");
> >>> -         for (i = 0; i < nunits;
> >>> -              i++, index = int_const_binop (PLUS_EXPR, index, part_width))
> >>> -           {
> >>> -             tree a = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op0, part_width,
> >>> -                                        index);
> >>> -             tree b = tree_vec_extract (gsi, inner_type, op1, part_width,
> >>> -                                        index);
> >>> -             tree result = gimplify_build2 (gsi, code, ret_inner_type, a, b);
> >>> -             t = gimplify_build3 (gsi, BIT_INSERT_EXPR, ret_type, t, result,
> >>> -                                  bitsize_int (i));
> >>> -           }
> >>> -         t = gimplify_build1 (gsi, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, type, t);
> >>> -       }
> >>> +       t = expand_cmp_piecewise (gsi, type, op0, op1);
> >>>          else
> >>>          t = expand_vector_piecewise (gsi, do_compare, type,
> >>>                                       TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0)), op0, op1,
> >>> --
> >>> 2.28.0
> >>>
> >
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-23 12:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-28 14:18 [PATCH] VEC_COND_EXPR: fix ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr Martin Liška
2020-08-31  8:01 ` Richard Biener
2020-09-01 14:27   ` Martin Liška
2020-09-22 11:28     ` Martin Liška
2020-09-23 12:26       ` Richard Biener

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).