public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: OpenMP Patch Ping – including "[13 Regression]" patches
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:36:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75669240-a7d4-f5b1-a554-01a7b8cb5879@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d2ba3ac-0337-b58b-41a4-ba3100066001@codesourcery.com>

"[13 Regression]" OpenMP Fortran patches:

[Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Fix loop-iter var privatization with !$OMP LOOP [PR108512]
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/610531.html

[Patch][v2] OpenMP/Fortran: Partially fix non-rect loop nests [PR107424]
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/610584.html


Additionally, there several more patches pending, see below. Of those:

The first two small ones are very simple; especially the first one I
regard as obvious! The third one is a documentation patch.

The others are of varying complexity but I think some would be still suitable
for the current stage, including some which have been pinged since October :-(

Tobias

PS: The mentioned patches:

On 10.01.23 12:37, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi all, hello Jakub,
>
> Below is the updated list to last ping,
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607178.html
>
> NOTE to the list below: I have stopped checking older patches. I know
> some more are pending review, others need to be revised. I will re-check,
> once the below listed patches have been reviewed. Cf. old list.
>
> Thanks for the reviews done in between the last ping and now!
>
>  * * *
>
> Small patches
> =============
>
> * [Patch] Fortran: Extend align-clause checks of OpenMP's allocate clause
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608401.html
>   Tue Dec 13 16:38:22 GMT 2022
>
> * [Patch] OpenMP: Parse align clause in allocate directive in C/C++
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608404.html
>   Tue Dec 13 17:44:27 GMT 2022
>
> * Re: [Patch] libgomp.texi: Reverse-offload updates (was: [Patch]
> libgomp: Handle OpenMP's reverse offloads)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608245.html
>   Thu Nov 24 12:01:04 GMT 2022
>
> (Side note: wwwdocs also needs to be updated for the latter patch and
> some other patches done in the meanwhile.)
>
>
> Fortran allocat(e,ors) prep patch
> =================================
>
> * [Patch] Fortran/OpenMP: Add parsing support for allocators/allocate
> directive (was: [Patch] Fortran/OpenMP: Add parsing support for
> allocators directive)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608904.html
>   Wed Dec 21 15:51:25 GMT 2022
>
> (Remark: While written from scratch, it is kind of a follow-up to
> Abid's patch
>    [PATCH 1/5] [gfortran] Add parsing support for allocate directive
> (OpenMP 5.0)
> you/Jakub reviewed on Tue Oct 11 12:13:14 GMT 2022, i.e.
>  https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603258.html
> - For the actual implementation of 'allocators', we still have to
> solve the issues
>   raised in the review for '[PATCH 2/5] [gfortran] Translate allocate
> directive (OpenMP 5.0).'.
>   at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603279.html
> (and earlier in the thread);
>   implementing 'omp allocate' (Fortran/C/C++) seems to be easier but
> no one has started implementing
>   it so far - only parsing support exists.
> - The USM patches on semi-USM system run into a similar issue as
> 'allocators' and for it, some
>   ME omp_allocate is added.)
>
>
> Mapping related patches
> =======================
> (Complex but GCC needs a revision badly as it fixing several bugs and
> missing functionality.)
>
> * Complete patch set was just re-submitted by Julian, overiew patch is
>   [PATCH v6 00/11] OpenMP: C/C++ lvalue parsing, C/C++/Fortran
> "declare mapper" support
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/thread.html#609031
>   Fri Dec 23 12:12:53 GMT 2022
> * Note: For 10/11 of the set, there was a follow up this Monday
>   [PATCH v6 10/11] OpenMP: Support OpenMP 5.0 "declare mapper"
> directives for C
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609566.html
>
> [As it relates to one patch in the series:
>   '[Patch] Fortran/OpenMP: Fix DT struct-component with 'alloc' and
> array descr'
> That's mine, needs to be updated (WIP) and fixes array
> descriptor/alloc-string-length var
> issues, where descriptor/string length may need to be handled
> explicitly on data entering map,
> i.e. string lengths/allocator may require 'to:' instead of 'alloc:' -
> and on data exit mapping,
> the current code might add a bogus 'alloc:'. - Idea is to handle this
> explicitly
> in fortran/trans-openmp.cc instead of auto-adding it in the ME.
> Status: WIP - removed in ME but not all cases are handled yet in FE.)
>
>
> Fortran deep mapping (allocatable components)
> ====================
> (Old patch of March 2022, but first part now properly but belated
> submitted - today):
> [Patch][1/2] OpenMP: Add lang hooks + run-time filled map arrays for
> Fortran deep mapping of DT
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609637.html
>
> Tobias
-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-28 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-10 11:37 OpenMP Patch Ping Tobias Burnus
2023-01-28 17:36 ` Tobias Burnus [this message]
2023-02-07 16:34 ` OpenMP Patch Ping – including "[13 Regression]" patches Tobias Burnus
2023-02-14  9:40   ` Tobias Burnus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75669240-a7d4-f5b1-a554-01a7b8cb5879@codesourcery.com \
    --to=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).