From: Martin Uecker <uecker@tugraz.at>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: [C PATCH] Fix ICE for composite type for structs with unsigned bitfields [PR113492]
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:37:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75930f8a30c3de6c45988fb0f8762ef07cad23a9.camel@tugraz.at> (raw)
C23: Fix ICE for composite type for structs with unsigned bitfields [PR113492]
This patch fixes a bug when forming a composite type from structs that
contain an unsigned bitfield declared with int while using -funsigned-bitfields.
In such structs the unsigned integer type was not compatible to the
regular unsigned integer type used elsewhere in the C FE.
PR c/113492
gcc/c:
* c-decl.cc (grokdeclarator): Use c_common_unsigned_type instead of
unsigned_type_for to create the unsigned type for bitfields declared
with int when using -funsigned-bitfields.
gcc/testsuite:
* gcc.dg/pr113492.c: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-decl.cc b/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
index 4029bbc59fe..8d18a3e11f4 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
@@ -6947,7 +6947,7 @@ grokdeclarator (const struct c_declarator *declarator,
"signed". */
if (bitfield && !flag_signed_bitfields && !declspecs->explicit_signed_p
&& TREE_CODE (type) == INTEGER_TYPE)
- type = unsigned_type_for (type);
+ type = c_common_unsigned_type (type);
/* Figure out the type qualifiers for the declaration. There are
two ways a declaration can become qualified. One is something
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr113492.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr113492.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..56296c51072
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr113492.c
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/* PR 113492
+ * { dg-do compile }
+ * { dg-options "-std=c23 -funsigned-bitfields" } */
+
+struct foo {
+ int i : 3;
+} i;
+
+void test()
+{
+ struct foo {
+ unsigned i : 3;
+ } u;
+
+ 1 ? i : u;
+ 1 ? u : i;
+}
+
+struct bar {
+ unsigned i : 3;
+} u;
+
+void test2()
+{
+ struct bar {
+ int i : 3;
+ } i;
+
+ 1 ? i : u;
+ 1 ? u : i;
+}
+
+void test3()
+{
+ typedef int myint;
+ struct bar {
+ myint i : 3;
+ } i;
+
+ 1 ? i : u;
+ 1 ? u : i;
+}
+
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-20 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-20 18:37 Martin Uecker [this message]
2024-01-20 23:36 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75930f8a30c3de6c45988fb0f8762ef07cad23a9.camel@tugraz.at \
--to=uecker@tugraz.at \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).