From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62616 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2015 10:48:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 62605 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jul 2015 10:48:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:48:57 +0000 Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so65493575wig.0 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:48:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.142.209 with SMTP id ry17mr69603488wjb.5.1436784534021; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from android-5344fe5e44c2fa60.weghof (212-60-161-206.adsl.highway.telekom.at. [212.60.161.206]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm13886988wiz.13.2015.07.13.03.48.52 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:48:52 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <55A388D3.10506@arm.com> References: <559FBB13.80009@arm.com> <55A388D3.10506@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PATCH][RTL-ifcvt] Make non-conditional execution if-conversion more aggressive From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:48:00 -0000 To: Kyrill Tkachov CC: GCC Patches Message-ID: <7744EB28-92EE-43B8-AEC2-6324D31D1B91@gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg01015.txt.bz2 On July 13, 2015 11:45:55 AM GMT+02:00, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >Hi Bernhard, > >> Did you include go in your testing? >> I see: >> Unexpected results in this build (new failures) >> FAIL: encoding/json >> FAIL: go/printer >> FAIL: go/scanner >> FAIL: html/template >> FAIL: log >> FAIL: net/http >> FAIL: net/http/cgi >> FAIL: net/http/cookiejar >> FAIL: os >> FAIL: text/template > >Hmmm. I don't see these failures. I double checked right now and they >appear as PASS in my configuration. > >I tested make check-go on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configured with >--without-isl --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go. > >Are you sure this is not some other issue in your tree? I have ISL enabled. I do have a couple of local stuff but that tested fine before your patch and should not really have impact on the parts your patch touches. So maybe it's ISL. Thanks,