From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD86385772B for ; Wed, 3 May 2023 16:13:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7CD86385772B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-63b60366047so3844358b3a.1 for ; Wed, 03 May 2023 09:13:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1683130386; x=1685722386; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GKYOtjJRvhGNyD863XUpROcOukHWwFgHfTKLxDFVmkg=; b=Q7CS4MB6e5qo8uaUxsesOij2h0O08n70m/6oYFuYrS9IFaeljOLHA+YM9Xa2gD+Pwb x3Sf3gFhHfTzeIl8nwp1si4B6Vv/uHAXli/qjNbSbHWMwB9P6+NSY3o9WUUafou/O1uz w6K7NWeAS24QijrkiSuWCMMNjElMRICi14YnuC0W/mFTuAK5iYuokH3JvrA4zLVhmXeO ol1Eemqg8yQQHu85u0hQGYQHGsDw1wMNYwFGi7ClscjSOLarE51hii56n/tvcI66rH0H X5iNOVip3YEFpEDRZ1tagIkxBhIuhC94oLs3BA6r04HFNFX2fx1129BzxpxilRterDnz QOGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683130386; x=1685722386; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GKYOtjJRvhGNyD863XUpROcOukHWwFgHfTKLxDFVmkg=; b=Q2dVV55lNMMsJB9yoKBIuOaVofhR51fdEpxlA9+sx/09lJzg5kQJFbQNmXvvE7CgM7 XA6pYHwsRVG82vcU8RtzWtu7m7DME6DboGz9SvrgDUcmOuTzteW1Jh5eMY2/FuIEA9rY ypON4Cb5DTy1heLzvQw1GreZSlQHBc3modnxBwi6iKvj8oYV2cBHkoX9ahOYk3194Umz X1eTdrmnoNrFVvVe8aal046P+WOgJFAe6TyyasmWgI/fOdh9gWfp+k7iHXovPDpgVb3O +rbHgAIZ/qNGZPl9FgPTJqbzWNu3lm8Y6+q4eEV0ugzgYhEkLcxo8UL8Gr8XxBiBmBLw dZog== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyTKIACcli5yhgLfz6j0z1ucJ/6eVlmHy7ODymH2N4BEqd0421s ABj/kn/A/CBTYJcy1mkV4+LSQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4tzQZQY1nVVOcZsjnkaUIJYsCMb/CQHI+RfT5CURS0mBavd1U/vgDin1SX7y7tGQmN85rc8A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:234b:b0:63d:254a:3918 with SMTP id j11-20020a056a00234b00b0063d254a3918mr31950551pfj.29.1683130386492; Wed, 03 May 2023 09:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.17.156] ([50.221.140.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v2-20020aa78502000000b0063b675f01a5sm1349069pfn.11.2023.05.03.09.13.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 May 2023 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7812d161-f87c-a07a-8d93-612064a0f975@rivosinc.com> Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 09:13:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [committed] RISCV: Inline subword atomic ops Content-Language: en-US To: Palmer Dabbelt , jeffreyalaw@gmail.com Cc: richard.guenther@gmail.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Kito Cheng , david.abd@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org References: From: Patrick O'Neill In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 5/3/23 08:33, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Wed, 03 May 2023 08:13:23 PDT (-0700), jeffreyalaw@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> On 5/3/23 08:14, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >>> On Wed, 03 May 2023 02:49:41 PDT (-0700), richard.guenther@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 8:33 AM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5/2/23 14:34, Patrick O'Neill wrote: >>>>> > Is this OK for a backport to GCC-13 as well? >>>>> Let me sync with Richi & Jakub.  They're the release managers and >>>>> this >>>>> doesn't fall under the usual rules for things that can be backported. >>>> >>>> I would guess that most distros have these patches backported (SUSE >>>> has >>>> that to both 12 and 13), so it wouldn't make much of a difference.  >>>> Since >>> >>> That'd be my argument, too.  The distros that don't have this probably >>> have something scarier, like an implicit default to -latomic. >>> >>>> this is backend specific and RISCV is neither primary nor secondary >>>> it's up to the target maintainer discretion to bend the rules. >>> >>> Fair, though we're trying to at least pretend we're playing by the >>> rules... ;) >> So the net is let's backport this patch series to gcc-13. > > Sounds good. > > Patrick: do you mind sending up a backport?  There was a build fix > that just landed as well. Will do - thanks. Patrick