From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1561 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2016 13:45:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128287 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2016 13:45:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=increasing, unexplained, life X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:45:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1346EF8056; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-5-38.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.38]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uAEDjekP016776; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:45:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] more rtx_insn * stuff To: tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20161114080934.19056-1-tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org> From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <782f969c-f3da-d0e7-3a9b-dbde3be71f8f@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161114080934.19056-1-tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg01342.txt.bz2 On 11/14/2016 09:09 AM, tbsaunde+gcc@tbsaunde.org wrote: > From: Trevor Saunders > > Hi, > > Basically $subject which gets rid of a few more casts over all. > > I ment to get this out a little while back, but life got busy, and I didn't > read the status announcement properly, so virtually working from hawaii for > now. patches individually built and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and series > run through config-list.mk, ok? Ok for all except #3 and #11. For #3, I just don't like increasing indentation like that, I prefer to just declare the variable earlier. #11 does unexplained things with dyn_casts (why not as_a?) and templates. Bernd