public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: kito.cheng@gmail.com, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	gnu-toolchain@rivosinc.com, Robin Dapp <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gcc-15 2/3] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const mat: keep stack offsets aligned
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:27:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78474b71-f605-490d-95d5-9c6a7a162f75@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5afc379-0e66-4344-bf80-335b5cd3d1b9@gmail.com>



On 3/16/24 13:21, Jeff Law wrote:
> |   59944:	add	s0,sp,2047  <----
> |   59948:	mv	a2,a0
> |   5994c:	mv	a3,a1
> |   59950:	mv	a0,sp
> |   59954:	li	a4,1
> |   59958:	lui	a1,0x1
> |   5995c:	add	s0,s0,1     <---
> |   59960:	jal	59a3c
>
> SP here becomes unaligned, even if transitively which is undesirable as
> well as incorrect:
>   - ABI requires stack to be 8 byte aligned
>   - asm code looks weird and unexpected
>   - to the user it might falsely seem like a compiler bug even when not,
>     specially when staring at asm for debugging unrelated issue.
> It's not ideal, but I think it's still ABI compliant as-is.  If it 
> wasn't, then I suspect things like virtual origins in Ada couldn't be 
> made ABI compliant.

To be clear are u suggesting ADD sp, sp, 2047 is ABI compliant ?
I'd still like to avoid it as I'm sure someone will complain about it.

>> With the patch, we get following correct code instead:
>>
>> | ..
>> | 59944:	add	s0,sp,2032
>> | ..
>> | 5995c:	add	s0,s0,16
> Alternately you could tighten the positive side of the range of the 
> splitter from patch 1/3 so that you could always use 2032 rather than 
> 2047 on the first addi.   ie instead of allowing 2048..4094, allow 
> 2048..4064.

2033..4064 vs. 2048..4094

Yeah I was a bit split about this as well. Since you are OK with either,
I'll keep them as-is and perhaps add this observation to commitlog.

Thx,
-Vineet

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-19  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-16 17:35 [gcc-15 0/3] RISC-V improve stack/array access by constant mat tweak Vineet Gupta
2024-03-16 17:35 ` [gcc-15 1/3] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const materialization ... [part of PR/106265] Vineet Gupta
2024-03-16 20:28   ` Jeff Law
2024-03-19  0:07     ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-23  5:59       ` Jeff Law
2024-03-16 17:35 ` [gcc-15 2/3] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const mat: keep stack offsets aligned Vineet Gupta
2024-03-16 20:21   ` Jeff Law
2024-03-19  0:27     ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2024-03-19  6:48       ` Andrew Waterman
2024-03-19 13:10         ` Jeff Law
2024-03-19 20:05           ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-19 20:58             ` Andrew Waterman
2024-03-19 21:17             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-03-20 18:57             ` Jeff Law
2024-03-23  6:05             ` Jeff Law
2024-03-16 17:35 ` [gcc-15 3/3] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const mat in prologue/epilogue expansion [PR/105733] Vineet Gupta
2024-03-16 20:27   ` Jeff Law
2024-03-19  4:41 ` [gcc-15 0/3] RISC-V improve stack/array access by constant mat tweak Jeff Law
2024-03-21  0:45   ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-21 14:36   ` scheduler queue flush (was Re: [gcc-15 0/3] RISC-V improve stack/array access by constant mat tweak) Vineet Gupta
2024-03-21 14:45     ` Jeff Law
2024-03-21 17:19       ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-21 19:56         ` Jeff Law
2024-03-22  0:34           ` scheduler queue flush Vineet Gupta
2024-03-22  8:47           ` scheduler queue flush (was Re: [gcc-15 0/3] RISC-V improve stack/array access by constant mat tweak) Richard Biener
2024-03-22 12:29             ` Jeff Law
2024-03-22 16:56               ` Vineet Gupta
2024-03-25  3:05         ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78474b71-f605-490d-95d5-9c6a7a162f75@rivosinc.com \
    --to=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gnu-toolchain@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).