From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59707 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2016 19:28:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59692 invoked by uid 89); 28 Sep 2016 19:28:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:28:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4A6C04D2EC for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-4-239.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.239]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8SJSEbe032742; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:28:15 -0400 Subject: Re: Patch ping To: Jakub Jelinek , Jeff Law References: <20160928192450.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <788754ad-a27a-d64c-d1f2-a1f29de9805b@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:35:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160928192450.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg02187.txt.bz2 On 09/28/2016 09:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'd like to ping the > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01436.html > > patch, containing various fixes for gimple-ssa-sprintf.c. > If the 0 < var to var > 0 changes are deemed too controversial, I can > separate them from the other changes. I'd like to see them separated because they are obvious and good, so please install them first. Bernd