From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@xry111.site>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A52A3858418
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:38:08 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1A52A3858418
Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest
 SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
 by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B25FC669C1;
 Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:38:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <789236c0c76fde4353cf029712634336cae12740.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: Mips: Fix kernel_stat structure size
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Dimitrije Milosevic <Dimitrije.Milosevic@Syrmia.com>, Hans-Peter Nilsson
 <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: Djordje Todorovic <Djordje.Todorovic@syrmia.com>, 
 "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:38:02 +0800
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR03MB4882B70DCC364C186725D87982869@AM0PR03MB4882.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AM0PR03MB488253CF19B1113D56777D3182BD9@AM0PR03MB4882.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.20.16.2207082134410.89039@arjuna.pair.com>
 <56af834718d603a4175a10df0a047d92b0b6d139.camel@xry111.site>
 <alpine.BSF.2.20.16.2207091019310.41348@arjuna.pair.com>
 <AM0PR03MB4882B70DCC364C186725D87982869@AM0PR03MB4882.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.3 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,
 LIKELY_SPAM_FROM, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:38:09 -0000

On Tue, 2022-07-12 at 06:42 +0000, Dimitrije Milosevic wrote:

> I will send out a review, covering both 32 ABIs, meaning that both O32
> and N32 ABIs will be working properly.

Please CC me (@xry111) in LLVM review.

By the way, if you have some spare time, you can also add the value for
Musl (all 3 ABIs).  Musl has a different struct stat than Glibc (it's PR
106136 in GCC bugzilla).

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University