public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* C++ ABI
@ 2022-09-30 13:43 Nathan Sidwell
  2022-09-30 13:54 ` Nathan Sidwell
  2022-09-30 16:32 ` Patrick Palka
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2022-09-30 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Merrill, Marek Polacek, Patrick Palka; +Cc: GCC Patches

Hi,
I've discovered some mangling problems with lambdas.  (a) divergence 
from clang and (b) manglings that incorrectly demangle.  With #a I'm not 
yet sure who is correct.  for #b g++ is definitely wrong.

 From the docs, it doesn't appear to have been bumped this cycle.  Is 
that correct, and I should bump it to 18?

nathan
-- 
Nathan Sidwell

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: C++ ABI
  2022-09-30 13:43 C++ ABI Nathan Sidwell
@ 2022-09-30 13:54 ` Nathan Sidwell
  2022-09-30 16:32 ` Patrick Palka
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2022-09-30 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Merrill, Marek Polacek, Patrick Palka; +Cc: GCC Patches

On 9/30/22 09:43, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Hi,
> I've discovered some mangling problems with lambdas.  (a) divergence 
> from clang and (b) manglings that incorrectly demangle.  With #a I'm not 
> yet sure who is correct.  for #b g++ is definitely wrong.
> 
>  From the docs, it doesn't appear to have been bumped this cycle.  Is 
> that correct, and I should bump it to 18?

oops, 'it' == -fabi-version

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: C++ ABI
  2022-09-30 13:43 C++ ABI Nathan Sidwell
  2022-09-30 13:54 ` Nathan Sidwell
@ 2022-09-30 16:32 ` Patrick Palka
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Palka @ 2022-09-30 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nathan Sidwell; +Cc: Jason Merrill, Marek Polacek, Patrick Palka, GCC Patches

On Fri, 30 Sep 2022, Nathan Sidwell wrote:

> Hi,
> I've discovered some mangling problems with lambdas.  (a) divergence from
> clang and (b) manglings that incorrectly demangle.  With #a I'm not yet sure
> who is correct.  for #b g++ is definitely wrong.
> 
> From the docs, it doesn't appear to have been bumped this cycle.  Is that
> correct, and I should bump it to 18?

AFAICT it hasn't been bumped since no mangling changes have been made
yet this cycle.

> 
> nathan
> -- 
> Nathan Sidwell
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-30 16:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-30 13:43 C++ ABI Nathan Sidwell
2022-09-30 13:54 ` Nathan Sidwell
2022-09-30 16:32 ` Patrick Palka

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).