From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69342 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2017 13:05:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69320 invoked by uid 89); 26 Nov 2017 13:05:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:db3e8a9, H*f:sk:boris.2, HTo:U*boris, antivirus X-HELO: mail-pg0-f67.google.com Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com (HELO mail-pg0-f67.google.com) (74.125.83.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 13:05:10 +0000 Received: by mail-pg0-f67.google.com with SMTP id c123so17505436pga.11 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 05:05:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MwGqOBBkZjFsaiiy+/qOp+x4jMWuSMXAB0oGzlTWA3Q=; b=r2YIOAU23kTOcxLI6UI9EdEjU2FYX6/S0+wYMh+tlxP2o1+0u2hC34n/lu2U4INtRI Gh17GxfC9gjBcxbcXbNNkhh9EtehNPyEl2x17RGBHkHkSXDGYVdaYKQSY7H8TH+GKdiS X1M3kw9vrhwWFfX1uP7nvz+b0PsgKWbnlKDmgEto4JGehDNLpiyFtolqfRcfdWqTJAsS 8oaI08PSVfptGluVsxubN0l82RbGzc3LJ4Q7SqK5zJE/aVRlxH4CybWRDxGqmnqvLrP1 r1UeResdelbJWeavr52pY564185fZPBM401McS6FaEKmb8NkBO+4UyvI3bW9k/60N7zh ++dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6l/NZN4bVyVsFxqAUunXCmet1tXAFjJeznXawTGL3qnUW0ZiAB pD41rYXgIKWniO8wG1urYNyMyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMac3fzfzKPAJuWVfAG7HvhHqPaGrbJRrVc17rdSV6KBYpLPzyB+FJsXK3Q9UkZUqFI9kXa+UQ== X-Received: by 10.99.190.72 with SMTP id g8mr10562022pgo.170.1511701508016; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 05:05:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:e68:4074:b3ac:f64d:30ff:fe63:5a5a? ([2001:e68:4074:b3ac:f64d:30ff:fe63:5a5a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q72sm45902597pfi.42.2017.11.26.05.05.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Nov 2017 05:05:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PING] Plugin support on Windows/MinGW From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> To: Boris Kolpackov Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: Message-ID: <791f23af-555e-3ead-2db7-52a4c61cf456@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 20:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6tvE5kiblViA0lP41Pvo6tdpdFO1S0GH7" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg02252.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6tvE5kiblViA0lP41Pvo6tdpdFO1S0GH7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="9EJlJsfj8vtPK0uQjpW8gP95M0gGbq1bK"; protected-headers="v1" From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> To: Boris Kolpackov Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <791f23af-555e-3ead-2db7-52a4c61cf456@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PING] Plugin support on Windows/MinGW References: In-Reply-To: --9EJlJsfj8vtPK0uQjpW8gP95M0gGbq1bK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1030 On 11/23/2017 11:34 AM, JonY wrote: > On 11/22/2017 11:14 AM, Boris Kolpackov wrote: >> JonY <10walls@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Is there a problem with using .so for internal libraries instead of >>> "dll"... >> >> I think not but I haven't tested it. The problem with using .so instead >> of .dll is that producing this non-standard extension may not be easy >> or possible depending on the build system/tool (e.g., libtool). Also, >> you never know how other pieces of the system (like antivirus) will >> react to a file that looks like a DLL but is called something else. >> >> >=20 > Libtool shouldn't matter since it is not used to build those, and I > doubt AVs would care what the filename is called. Apache on Windows uses > .so plugins too. >=20 >>> ... if it simplifies the code? >> >> I don't think it simplifies that much and the potential (and unknown) >> downside is significant. >> >> Thanks for the review, >> Boris >> >=20 > I'll commit in a few days if there are no more inputs. >=20 Applied to trunk r255154. --9EJlJsfj8vtPK0uQjpW8gP95M0gGbq1bK-- --6tvE5kiblViA0lP41Pvo6tdpdFO1S0GH7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 858 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJGBAEBCAAwFiEE5QrdnbBX9Ppk4bbPcTtf4pwUXUUFAloau/sSHDEwd2FsbHNA Z21haWwuY29tAAoJEHE7X+KcFF1FDMkP/jQMIc2CpTTR2Sw1ATo+LtRfHTrQQDg1 rMteIgjSkBq9F+K5hPYbrfwQ2bSMJ7ljCq3v//URRh7ZZfCoNXaHGmoXvMORprSD 3+kzPQZuCCswAdl2yhxt4IpbyD1kQ29Rs/ZSMRuNwmnpVeEDMASQFbqLNacqjvtb kUJ78bPX6S+rhfIOz60pTp10f+x8xC8coq3e1Ph6ug7uCq+AzzgW6Qh93oBGcM/u jVzshG3334N/sdXyKnIvckwPPB1ModjcZ52g4xdigHoiOPj5GFbcn71AAIqPLk8O mXvmFc9dJ9JCNOJyQpCgoS6E/1lVi3DGOCX20vtIPcnbQIt+MzJrguG4tvvq0WOG 9f2qQVmqdB3+l18cyJWltgR3U2emI0Z+We297jIQ2v6hiazGLsKtq1pmk/HVJ8nt LjW4X8cPupqWzJvl3iPkru6luPwqqsO9EY4gznGV5GWyX+byzdCfNRIvcPkqv3zb 9uqsmsluHj4YkyTmVmFdpIxvgbo03Z3tjy5cjsSKTMBTIyo7SiO22ozNfOLf20Lh 0RPyZq4RZ6bztmQSvLBEMMN5Adr8m91L+1eQslYIZg18wgnTmX0gUKMQnzNZsc2Q bJtfRSRlPFzWDVtzpJQZrZiD4yYOwkhYNw3HWt5tBFOfYs0snezL7CB/LDXqHdQL /rwpYlhyWCqV =uQh1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6tvE5kiblViA0lP41Pvo6tdpdFO1S0GH7--