public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	Nick Alcock via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch][version 6] add -ftrivial-auto-var-init and variable attribute "uninitialized" to gcc
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:02:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7AD092FB-62D6-4C87-B141-FD649E7B3F93@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2108180904220.11781@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>



> On Aug 18, 2021, at 2:15 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Aug 17, 2021, at 9:50 AM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 17, 2021, at 3:29 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> My current code for expand_DEFERRED_INIT is like the following, could you check and see whether there is any issue for it:
>>>>> 
>>>>> #define INIT_PATTERN_VALUE  0xFE
>>>>> static void
>>>>> expand_DEFERRED_INIT (internal_fn, gcall *stmt)
>>>>> {
>>>>> tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
>>>>> tree var_size = gimple_call_arg (stmt, 0);
>>>>> enum auto_init_type init_type
>>>>>  = (enum auto_init_type) TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (stmt, 1));
>>>>> bool is_vla = (bool) TREE_INT_CST_LOW (gimple_call_arg (stmt, 2));
>>>>> 
>>>>> tree var_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
>>>>> gcc_assert (init_type > AUTO_INIT_UNINITIALIZED);
>>>>> 
>>>>> if (is_vla || (!use_register_for_decl (lhs)))
>>>>>  {
>>>>>    if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME)
>>>>>      lhs = SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs);
>>>> 
>>>> this should not be necessary (in fact you shouldn't see a SSA_NAME
>>>> here, if you do then using SSA_NAME_VAR is wrong)
>>> You mean during RTL expansion phase, all SSA_NAMEs are gone already?
>> 
>> Actually, the lhs could be SSA_NAME here, 
>> 
>> Breakpoint 1, expand_DEFERRED_INIT (stmt=0x7fffe96ae348) at ../../latest-gcc/gcc/internal-fn.c:3021
>> 3021	      mark_addressable (lhs);
>> (gdb) call debug_tree(lhs)
>> <ssa_name 0x7fffe9584e58
>>    type <real_type 0x7fffe959b2a0 float sizes-gimplified SF
>>        size <integer_cst 0x7fffe9579f48 constant 32>
>>        unit-size <integer_cst 0x7fffe9579f60 constant 4>
>>        align:32 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set 2 canonical-type 0x7fffe959b2a0 precision:32
>>        pointer_to_this <pointer_type 0x7fffe959b7e0>>
>>    visited var <var_decl 0x7ffff7ff7bd0 temp1>
>>    def_stmt temp1_5 = .DEFERRED_INIT (4, 2, 0, &"temp1"[0]);
>>    version:5>
>> 
>> when I deleted:
>> 
>> if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == SSA_NAME
>>   lhs = SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs);
> 
> but then using SSA_NAME_VAR is broken.  I suspect use_register_for_decl
> isn't the correct thing to look at.  I think we need to look at what
> the LHS expanded to if it is a SSA_VAR_P (that includes SSA names
> but also plain DECLs but not what we get from VLAs where we'd see
> *ptr).  So sth like
> 
>  bool reg_lhs;
>  if (SSA_VAR_P (lhs))
>    {
>      rtx tem = expand_expr (lhs, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE);
>      reg_lhs = !MEM_P (tem);
>      /* If not MEM_P reg_lhs should be REG_P or SUBREG_P (but maybe
>         also CONCAT or lowpart...?)  */
>    }
>  else
>    {
>      gcc_assert (is_vla);
>      reg_lhs = false;
>    }
> 
>  if (!reg_lhs)
>    memset path
>  else
>    expand_assignment path

After making the following change:

+  bool reg_lhs = true;
 
   tree var_type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
   gcc_assert (init_type > AUTO_INIT_UNINITIALIZED);
 
-  if (is_vla || (!use_register_for_decl (lhs)))
+  if (SSA_VAR_P (lhs))
+    {
+      rtx tem = expand_expr (lhs, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE);
+      reg_lhs = !MEM_P (tem);
+    }
+  else
+    {
+      gcc_assert (is_vla);
+      reg_lhs = false;
+    }
+
+  if (!reg_lhs)
     {

I got exactly the same internal error that failed at expr.c:

 8436   /* We must have made progress.  */
 8437   gcc_assert (inner != exp);


Looks like for the following code:

3026   if (!reg_lhs)
3027     {
3028     /* If this is a VLA or the variable is not in register,
3029        expand to a memset to initialize it.  */
3030       mark_addressable (lhs);
3031       tree var_addr = build_fold_addr_expr (lhs);
3032 
3033       tree value = (init_type == AUTO_INIT_PATTERN) ?
3034                     build_int_cst (integer_type_node,
3035                                    INIT_PATTERN_VALUE) :
3036                     integer_zero_node;
3037       tree m_call = build_call_expr (builtin_decl_implicit (BUILT_IN_MEMSET),
3038                                      3, var_addr, value, var_size);
3039       /* Expand this memset call.  */
3040       expand_builtin_memset (m_call, NULL_RTX, TYPE_MODE (var_type));
3041     }

At line 3030, “lhs” could be a SSA_NAME.

My questions are:

1. Could the routine “mark_addressable” and “build_fold_addr_expr” be applied on SSA_NAME?
2. Could the routine “expand_builtin_memset” be applied on the memset call whose “DEST” is
    an address expression on SSA_NAME? 
3. Within “expand_DEFERRED_INIT”, can I call “expand_builtin_memset” to expand .DEFERRED_INIT?

I suspect that one of the above 3 might be the issue, but not sure which one?

Thanks a lot.

Qing
   


> bool reg_lhs;
>  if (SSA_VAR_P (lhs))
>    {
>      rtx tem = expand_expr (lhs, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE);
>      reg_lhs = !MEM_P (tem);
>      /* If not MEM_P reg_lhs should be REG_P or SUBREG_P (but maybe
>         also CONCAT or lowpart...?)  */
>    }
>  else
>    {
>      gcc_assert (is_vla);
>      reg_lhs = false;
>    }


> 
>> Many testing cases failed with internal compiler error:
>> 
>> /home/opc/Work/GCC/latest-gcc/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/auto-init-3.c:9:9: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8437
>> 0xe237aa expand_expr_addr_expr_1
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:8437
>> 0xe24059 expand_expr_addr_expr
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:8525
>> 0xe32b56 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:11741
>> 0xe2da52 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:10777
>> 0xe24706 expand_expr_real(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.c:8713
>> 0xc13f15 expand_expr
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/expr.h:301
>> 0xc17acb get_memory_rtx
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/builtins.c:1370
>> 0xc2223d expand_builtin_memset_args
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/builtins.c:4102
>> 0xc21a20 expand_builtin_memset(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode)
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/builtins.c:3886
>> 0xfb5c85 expand_DEFERRED_INIT
>> 	../../latest-gcc/gcc/internal-fn.c:3031
>> 
>> 
>> So, did I do anything wrong?
>> 
>> Qing
> 
> -- 
> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
> Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-18 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27  3:26 Qing Zhao
2021-07-28 20:21 ` Kees Cook
2021-07-28 21:53   ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 14:09 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-09 16:38   ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 17:14     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10  7:36     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 13:39       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 14:16         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:02           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 15:22             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:55               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 20:16               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 22:26                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11  7:02                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:33                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:37                       ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:54                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:58                           ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 14:00                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:30                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:53                               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:22                                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:55                                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:57                                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 20:30                                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 22:03                                       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:12                                         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 14:48                                           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 15:08                                             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:39                                               ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:11                                       ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 16:48                                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 15:04                                           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 20:40                                             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18  7:19                                               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 14:39                                                 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11  9:02                   ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 13:44                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:15                       ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 16:29                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 19:24   ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 22:45     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16  7:40     ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:45       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17  8:29         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:50           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 16:08             ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18  7:15               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 16:02                 ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2021-08-19  9:00                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-19 13:54                     ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-20 14:52                       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-23 13:55                       ` Richard Biener
2021-09-02 17:24                         ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 19:49       ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17  8:43         ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:03           ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 14:45             ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:53               ` Qing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7AD092FB-62D6-4C87-B141-FD649E7B3F93@oracle.com \
    --to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).