From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17601 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2014 16:32:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17590 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2014 16:32:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.162) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:32:53 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-15v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.239]) by resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id t4X21o00h5AAYLo014YhLM; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:32:41 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d] ([IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d]) by resomta-po-15v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id t4XN1o00T2ztT3H014XPcv; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:31:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: parallel check output changes? From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <20140919093723.GA26414@gate.crashing.org> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:32:00 -0000 Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Bernd Schmidt , Andrew MacLeod , gcc-patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7B88E430-DD81-451D-8C4D-55BB45803747@comcast.net> References: <541AD692.4030907@redhat.com> <20140918130109.GH17454@tucnak.redhat.com> <541AD880.7080703@redhat.com> <541AF451.3070406@redhat.com> <541B1710.8060809@codesourcery.com> <20140918173609.GM17454@tucnak.redhat.com> <20140918184455.GB28595@gate.crashing.org> <20140919093723.GA26414@gate.crashing.org> To: Segher Boessenkool X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg01656.txt.bz2 On Sep 19, 2014, at 2:37 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 01:44:55PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> I am testing a patch that is just >>=20 >>=20 >> diff --git a/contrib/dg-extract-results.py b/contrib/dg-extract-results.= py >> index cccbfd3..3781423 100644 >> --- a/contrib/dg-extract-results.py >> +++ b/contrib/dg-extract-results.py >> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ class Prog: >> self.tool_re =3D re.compile (r'^\t\t=3D=3D=3D (.*) tests =3D=3D= =3D$') >> self.result_re =3D re.compile (r'^(PASS|XPASS|FAIL|XFAIL|UNRESOL= VED' >> r'|WARNING|ERROR|UNSUPPORTED|UNTEST= ED' >> - r'|KFAIL):\s*(\S+)') >> + r'|KFAIL):\s*(.+)') >> self.completed_re =3D re.compile (r'.* completed at (.*)') >> # Pieces of text to write at the head of the output. >> # start_line is a pair in which the first element is a datetime >=20 > Tested that with four runs on powerpc64-linux, four configs each time; > test-summary > shows the same in all cases. Many lines have moved compared to without > the patch, but that cannot be helped. Okay for mainline? Ok. > I also did some timings for make -j60 -k check, same -m64,-m32,-m32/-mpow= erpc64, > -m64/-mlra configs. A run takes 65m, is effectively 42x parallel, and ha= s 15% > system time. Thanks for the work and for the timings.