From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 125818 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2015 22:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 125806 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2015 22:23:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.167) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:23:26 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.232]) by resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id bAPQ1r003516pyw01APQNM; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:23:24 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d] ([IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d]) by resomta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id bAPN1r00A2ztT3H01APPLd; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:23:23 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Unit tests framework (v3) From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <5632745A.6040004@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 22:32:00 -0000 Cc: David Malcolm , Bernd Schmidt , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7EA519B1-A462-4C0C-A9FF-CC9A2A654123@comcast.net> References: <5589B2FB.8010500@redhat.com> <1445975355-37660-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <5630B3C9.10409@redhat.com> <1446135023.26362.47.camel@surprise> <5632745A.6040004@redhat.com> To: Jeff Law X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg03287.txt.bz2 On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > Something similar for RTL would be cool, but probably even harder given t= he amount of state that's traditionally been kept out of the IL stream. I'= m sure some things are better today than in the past, but it's probably a v= ery tanged mess to get to where we want to go with RTL. I had a bit of an rtl front end once. It was never complete, and likely wa= s the 20% effort that did 20% of the actual job that needs doing even for a= simple hello world program. Ah, too bad you didn=92t ask around 10-15 yea= rs ago. I likely could have just pull that code out of a bag, as it is, li= kely lost in time.