From: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Movable initializer lists (C++ N4166)
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 16:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7F4F7451-0753-431B-9C7D-98BD100BAF85@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505031722090.1611@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr>
> On 2015–05–03, at 11:27 PM, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 May 2015, David Krauss wrote:
>
>> (Yes, I know that a “compile farm” exists. It appears to be obsolete; perhaps someone could vouch for it?)
>
> What gave you that impression? It doesn't have a lot of variety, but it has perfectly usable x86(_64) systems, and some very impressive POWER ones.
It’s hard to judge by looking at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm because newer and older machines are mixed together in the list, and some of the ones which are still powerful enough (gcc75, gcc76) are nevertheless a few years old. Maybe servers circa 2010 are still faster than my newish, 4x2-core laptop at building GCC, I can’t really estimate.
Checking the list now, it’s less confusing than it was when I last looked in February, which could also be characterized as a decrease in variety. However, this raises the question of machines being taken offline.
Besides that, are some machines overloaded? If I need to use POWER, will there be a learning curve or brittleness as on Darwin? To avoid trial and error whilst wading into the process, I’m just asking for some personal confirmation of suitability for my particular needs: same-day turnaround for clean rebuilds + testsuite validation. Too many days of my life have gone into setting up GCC builds (and then setting up again elsewhere when a problem comes up).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-03 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-03 14:48 David Krauss
2015-05-03 15:27 ` Marc Glisse
2015-05-03 16:00 ` David Krauss [this message]
2015-05-06 10:18 ` David Krauss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7F4F7451-0753-431B-9C7D-98BD100BAF85@gmail.com \
--to=potswa@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).