From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: segher@kernel.crashing.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com, linkw@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]rs6000: Load high and low part of 64bit constant independently
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:15:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b482d49-3928-552c-ccf5-d391684b7f2b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220915083052.74903-1-guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Jeff,
Sorry for the late review.
on 2022/9/15 16:30, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For a complicate 64bit constant, blow is one instruction-sequence to
> build:
> lis 9,0x800a
> ori 9,9,0xabcd
> sldi 9,9,32
> oris 9,9,0xc167
> ori 9,9,0xfa16
>
> while we can also use below sequence to build:
> lis 9,0xc167
> lis 10,0x800a
> ori 9,9,0xfa16
> ori 10,10,0xabcd
> rldimi 9,10,32,0
> This sequence is using 2 registers to build high and low part firstly,
> and then merge them.
> In parallel aspect, this sequence would be faster. (Ofcause, using 1 more
> register with potential register pressure).
>
> Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64le.
> Is this ok for trunk?
>
>
> BR,
> Jeff(Jiufu)
>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (rs6000_emit_set_long_const): Update 64bit
> constant build.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/powerpc/parall_5insn_const.c: New test.
>
> ---
> gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 45 +++++++++++--------
> .../gcc.target/powerpc/parall_5insn_const.c | 27 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/parall_5insn_const.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> index a656cb32a47..759c6309677 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> @@ -10180,26 +10180,33 @@ rs6000_emit_set_long_const (rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT c)
> }
> else
> {
> - temp = !can_create_pseudo_p () ? dest : gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
> -
> - emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
> - GEN_INT (((ud4 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
> - if (ud3 != 0)
> - emit_move_insn (copy_rtx (temp),
> - gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
> - GEN_INT (ud3)));
> + if (can_create_pseudo_p ())
> + {
> + /* lis A,U4; ori A,U3; lis B,U2; ori B,U1; rldimi A,B,32,0. */
Nit: A, B are supposed to be H, L?
> + rtx H = gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
> + rtx L = gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
> + HOST_WIDE_INT num = (ud2 << 16) | ud1;
> + rs6000_emit_set_long_const (L, (num ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
> + num = (ud4 << 16) | ud3;
> + rs6000_emit_set_long_const (H, (num ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000);
> + emit_insn (gen_rotldi3_insert_3 (dest, H, GEN_INT (32), L,
> + GEN_INT (0xffffffff)));
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + /* lis A, U4; ori A,U3; rotl A,32; oris A,U2; ori A,U1. */
~~~ unexpected space?
> + emit_move_insn (dest,
> + GEN_INT (((ud4 << 16) ^ 0x80000000) - 0x80000000));
> + if (ud3 != 0)
> + emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, dest, GEN_INT (ud3)));
>
> - emit_move_insn (ud2 != 0 || ud1 != 0 ? copy_rtx (temp) : dest,
> - gen_rtx_ASHIFT (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
> - GEN_INT (32)));
> - if (ud2 != 0)
> - emit_move_insn (ud1 != 0 ? copy_rtx (temp) : dest,
> - gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
> - GEN_INT (ud2 << 16)));
> - if (ud1 != 0)
> - emit_move_insn (dest,
> - gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, copy_rtx (temp),
> - GEN_INT (ud1)));
> + emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_ASHIFT (DImode, dest, GEN_INT (32)));
> + if (ud2 != 0)
> + emit_move_insn (dest,
> + gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, dest, GEN_INT (ud2 << 16)));
> + if (ud1 != 0)
> + emit_move_insn (dest, gen_rtx_IOR (DImode, dest, GEN_INT (ud1)));
> + }
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/parall_5insn_const.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/parall_5insn_const.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..ed8ccc73378
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/parall_5insn_const.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power7 -save-temps" } */
Why do we need power7 here?
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlis\M} 4 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mori\M} 4 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrldimi\M} 2 } } */
> +
> +void __attribute__ ((noinline)) foo (unsigned long long *a)
> +{
> + /* 2lis+2ori+1rldimi for each constant. */
Nit: seems better to read with "/* 2 lis + 2 ori + 1 rldimi for ..."
BR,
Kewen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-25 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-15 8:30 Jiufu Guo
2022-11-25 9:15 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
2022-11-25 13:21 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-11-25 13:31 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-11-25 15:46 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-11-27 13:09 ` Jiufu Guo
2022-11-28 1:50 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-11-28 2:35 ` Jiufu Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b482d49-3928-552c-ccf5-d391684b7f2b@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linkw@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).