From: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Postpone print of --help=* option.
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 08:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ba27916-cffb-5eb8-4585-69a30cfa4033@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8633a722-e8c4-5965-810e-4b0f33c27187@redhat.com>
On 4/30/19 6:18 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 4/1/19 6:11 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Last week I was curious which warnings are disabled by default on top
>> of -Wall and -Wextra. Thus I used --help=warning and noticed some discrepancy
>> in between documentation and output of the --help option.
>>
>> I created PR89885 where I explained that OPT__help_ option handling happens
>> early. That's why LangEnabledBy are not reflected and similarly target overrides
>> don't take place.
>>
>> I'm attaching diff for --help=warning for C++ and -Ofast.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2019-04-01 Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
>>
>> * gcc.c (process_command): Add dummy file only
>> if n_infiles == 0.
>> * opts-global.c (decode_options): Pass lang_mask.
>> * opts.c (print_help): New function.
>> (finish_options): Print --help if help_option_argument
>> is set.
>> (common_handle_option): Factor out content of OPT__help_
>> into print_help.
>> * opts.h (finish_options): Add new argument.
>> ---
>> gcc/gcc.c | 3 +-
>> gcc/opts-global.c | 2 +-
>> gcc/opts.c | 267 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> gcc/opts.h | 3 +-
>> 4 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>>
>> 0001-Postpone-print-of-help-option.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/gcc.c b/gcc/gcc.c
>> index 4f57765b012..7ce1cae28a7 100644
>> --- a/gcc/gcc.c
>> +++ b/gcc/gcc.c
>> @@ -4751,7 +4751,8 @@ process_command (unsigned int decoded_options_count,
>> }
>>
>> /* Ensure we only invoke each subprocess once. */
>> - if (print_subprocess_help || print_help_list || print_version)
>> + if (n_infiles == 0
>> + && (print_subprocess_help || print_help_list || print_version))
>> {
>> n_infiles = 0;
> The assignment to n_infiles is redundant after your change. I suspect
> the optimizers will catch this, so if you want to keep it for clarity
> that's fine with me.
>
> OK for the trunk. Your call whether or not to remove the redundant
> assignment.
Thank you for review. I've removed the redundancy assignment before
commit.
Martin
>
> jeff
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-01 12:11 Martin Liška
2019-04-30 16:39 ` Jeff Law
2019-05-02 8:15 ` Martin Liška [this message]
2019-05-02 10:31 ` Jakub Jelinek
2019-05-02 10:51 ` Martin Liška
2019-05-02 11:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2019-05-02 11:13 ` Martin Liška
2019-05-03 7:18 ` [PATCH] Fix build with offloading (Re: [RFC][PATCH] Postpone print of --help=* option.) Jakub Jelinek
2019-05-03 7:20 ` Richard Biener
2019-05-03 11:33 ` [RFC][PATCH] Postpone print of --help=* option Szabolcs Nagy
2019-05-03 11:36 ` Martin Liška
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ba27916-cffb-5eb8-4585-69a30cfa4033@suse.cz \
--to=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).