From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41608 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2017 17:55:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 41598 invoked by uid 89); 30 Mar 2017 17:55:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:987 X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:55:01 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v2UHsqtA125745 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:55:01 -0400 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29h1pes74v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:55:00 -0400 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:54:59 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e12.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.199) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:54:57 -0400 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v2UHsuu134013204; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:54:56 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EF4AE03B; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:54:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otta.rchland.ibm.com (unknown [9.10.86.70]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DF1AE056; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:54:45 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR target/80246, DFP builtins using the wrong types To: Segher Boessenkool References: <20170329222858.GZ4402@gate.crashing.org> <530c97bd-1669-dd67-528e-3f879efa8bac@vnet.ibm.com> <20170330171526.GB4402@gate.crashing.org> Cc: GCC Patches , David Edelsohn , Bill Schmidt From: Peter Bergner Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:27:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170330171526.GB4402@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17033017-0048-0000-0000-00000143D12A X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00006875; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000206; SDB=6.00840869; UDB=6.00413927; IPR=6.00618886; BA=6.00005248; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00014866; XFM=3.00000013; UTC=2017-03-30 17:54:58 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17033017-0049-0000-0000-0000401B7AB4 Message-Id: <7bfa5bba-a693-f84b-8346-729f43c02deb@vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-03-30_14:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1703300155 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg01529.txt.bz2 On 3/30/17 12:15 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "drintn\\." } } */ >>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "drintnq\\." } } */ >>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dctfix" } } */ >>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dctfixq" } } */ >>> >>> If there is no "dctfix" there surely is no "dctfixq" either (i.e., your >>> regexen aren't very tight). >> >> Ahh, true. I suppose I could also just look for "drintn" too, >> since that would catch both drintn. and drintnq., ok with that >> change? > > Please add a comment what instructions each regex is supposed to match, then? > Okay with such a change. Actually, the following is probably better. I'll go with this unless you object. /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "drintn\[q\]\." } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dctfix\[q\]" } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "dcffix\[q\]" } } */ Peter