public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Tebbs <Sam.Tebbs@arm.com>
To: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com>,
	James Greenhalgh	<James.Greenhalgh@arm.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Richard Earnshaw	<Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>, nd	<nd@arm.com>,
	"ian@airs.com" <ian@airs.com>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][GCC][AARCH64] Add support for pointer authentication B key
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7dfd7d67-99a1-12c1-2e0d-a48bfbd6c0e2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C3C67EC.1010508@foss.arm.com>

On 14/01/2019 10:43, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:

>
> On 08/01/19 11:38, Sam Tebbs wrote:
>>
>> On 1/7/19 6:28 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 09:00:10AM -0600, Sam Tebbs wrote:
>> >> On 11/9/18 11:04 AM, Sam Tebbs wrote:
>> >
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> >> Attached is an improved patch with "hint" removed from the test 
>> scans,
>> >> pauth_hint_num_a and pauth_hint_num_b merged into pauth_hint_num 
>> and the
>> >> "gcc_assert (cfun->machine->frame.laid_out)" removal reverted 
>> since was
>> >> an unnecessary change.
>> >>
>> >> OK for trunk?
>> > While the AArch64 parts look OK to me and are buried behind an 
>> option so are
>> > relatively safe even though we're late in development, you'll need 
>> someone
>> > else to approve the libgcc changes. Especially as you change a generic
>> > routine with an undocumented (?) AArch64-specific change.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > James
>>
>> Thanks James, CC'ing Ian Lance Taylor.
>>
>
> Jeff, could you help with reviewing the libgcc changes please?
> I believe the latest version was posted at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01569.html
>
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
ping 3. The preceding two patches were committed a while ago but require 
the minor libgcc changes in this patch, which are the only parts left to 
be reviewed.
>
>> The documentation relevant to the libgcc change is expected to be
>> published in the near future.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-23 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-02 17:35 Sam Tebbs
2018-11-02 18:02 ` Sam Tebbs
2018-11-09 11:05   ` Sam Tebbs
2018-12-21 15:04     ` Sam Tebbs
2019-01-04 16:56       ` Sam Tebbs
2019-01-07 18:28       ` James Greenhalgh
2019-01-08 11:38         ` Sam Tebbs
2019-01-14 10:44           ` Kyrill Tkachov
2019-01-23 10:43             ` Sam Tebbs [this message]
2019-01-31 14:56               ` Sam Tebbs
2019-03-01 14:12                 ` Sam Tebbs
2019-05-29  9:29                   ` Sam Tebbs
2019-05-29 11:53                     ` Christophe Lyon
2019-05-29 14:24                       ` Sam Tebbs
2019-05-30 12:29                         ` Sam Tebbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7dfd7d67-99a1-12c1-2e0d-a48bfbd6c0e2@arm.com \
    --to=sam.tebbs@arm.com \
    --cc=James.Greenhalgh@arm.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ian@airs.com \
    --cc=kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).