From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99A903858CDA for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 99A903858CDA Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 99A903858CDA Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1702321889; cv=none; b=C5swoedTY1aenBSzE+uGdXYUM+6CzVRBalPw+EZoTJYGjS2QLSzKrMBystKcAhIeMc3l9oRujUczJijsJyO5SvqU4LHoSOfmy49BLGqwHA38VYb5He+JGmwysXHmg14BaawKr3T++7ZHMRs7DApad1k4tNyEKXPQzccjuVDPEQY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1702321889; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zghchJitRxvMoUno6Yah6eOgaqzbzEBVMkSq4Hf7j3E=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To; b=DpOzBnDAeraQ9zYIBC7li6oNfu6JdlUlAO14Qsmx9IMIuA3rAxjhfkb5TbTKH3yRxQtXxlXBDCkeL6+wr/u8aKxhincWXwTzMh8+GiZQySHrsZpcTiS1xiMjbR9TViZ52X0Qnl6/u/eo73hyHbaAhNSKuBEJyVQGBcV0JbqhGRM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from pps.filterd (m0353724.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3BBI3Ole015161; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:25 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : from : to : cc : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=sSJkGMcQu5+FBg4u8F4P2Pj60W1VhhntEdi7EV8EToQ=; b=UByd1wcLD1srkE+s1NdeTOm/0jriC/sMZi8Nn3rtiDZ2RBviush4lIh7rev7CdMCiYeM MocnjdQXIHub2dPw5KRrBM7iUKn/jjUaHpG1I1b0fCK7BkYftgXVHAi+fEmKc9C0Fgfr QOe8MCtnw2pgl4hPEimmRUKpv51oPd1YCztSFiZSyUYYcD217O3ttkNrRT9rWKtPW60t PZJTc3UOvpDm4G9nws7aKeWHa2Fbbf0+CFvJ+TlkVDxIEOvOv8A7S07oTAuJv4qyeWP9 /tPXRmPoRws+eLs+h2gyJqu6fVi5DX989njajR1tY5q6LVZhd28kr8QT+pvir2t3V6Tg Sg== Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ux7c19qf8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:24 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3BBGupTi005066; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:19 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.73]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3uw4sk3bwb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:19 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.104]) by smtprelay06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 3BBJBIoK21168798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:18 GMT Received: from smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4DB5805D; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C826358056; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.79.182.105] (unknown [9.79.182.105]) by smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:11:16 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <7f234612-35c0-4ccb-9293-47644ea91494@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:41:14 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PING ^3][PATCH] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895] Content-Language: en-US From: jeevitha To: Segher Boessenkool , GCC Patches Cc: Peter Bergner , meissner@linux.ibm.com References: <460cd2bd-7c82-95d8-c58e-f32da70ab2a9@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <9a300552-21a6-cc4c-294d-bec0c6b3739c@linux.ibm.com> <0dc6b9fc-6542-47d1-8ea1-b7cee46b1b29@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <0dc6b9fc-6542-47d1-8ea1-b7cee46b1b29@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 0IB_I8gHgTtnwdOIoI721C2sw-RsYWv8 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 0IB_I8gHgTtnwdOIoI721C2sw-RsYWv8 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-12-11_08,2023-12-07_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2312110158 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Ping! Please review On 13/11/23 8:38 pm, jeevitha wrote: > Ping! > > please review. > > Thanks & Regards > Jeevitha > > On 25/08/23 7:49 am, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On 8/24/23 12:35 PM, Michael Meissner wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:05:28AM +0530, jeevitha wrote: >>>> gcc/ >>>> PR target/110411 >>>> * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (enum rs6000_builtin_type_index): Add fields >>>> to hold PTImode type. >>>> * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.cc (rs6000_init_builtins): Add node >>>> for PTImode type. >>> >>> It is good as far as it goes, but I suspect we will eventually need to extend >>> it. In particular, the reason people need PTImode is they need the even/odd >>> register layout. What you've done enables users to declare this value. >> >> Sure, it could be extended, but that is not what this patch is about. >> It's purely to allow the kernel team access to the guaranteed even/odd >> register layout for some inline asm code. Any extension would be a >> follow-on patch to this. >> >> >> >> On 8/9/23 3:48 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote: >>> IIUC, this builtin type registering makes this type expose to users, so >>> I wonder if we want to actually expose this type for users' uses. >>> If yes, we need to update the documentation (and not sure if the current >>> name is good enough); Is the current name acceptable if we're not going to document the type? >> >> Segher, Mike, Jeevitha and I talked about the patch and Segher mentioned >> that under some conditions, it's fine to keep the type undocumented. >> Hopefully he'll weigh in on whether this particular patch is one of >> those cases or not. >> >> >> Peter Thanks & Regards Jeevitha