From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 101462 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2019 16:45:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101454 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2019 16:45:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=objections, friday, H*F:D*ru, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mail.ispras.ru Received: from mail.ispras.ru (HELO mail.ispras.ru) (83.149.199.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:45:54 +0000 Received: from mail.ispras.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ispras.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1BBE5400A9 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:45:51 +0300 (MSK) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:16:00 -0000 From: Roman Zhuykov To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [0/4] Addressing modulo-scheduling bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7f3d315e7de0aeedc65ab7225a3ee794@ispras.ru> X-Sender: zhroma@ispras.ru User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00860.txt.bz2 As a freshly appointed maintainer I’m ready to commit my own modulo-sched patches, but decide to ask here if there are any objections. Maybe I should ask any additional approval at this stage? If no, I’ll start tomorrow with committing patches 1/4 and 2/4 which are well-formed regression fixes. Patch 3/4 doesn’t include test example, and I don’t know how to add it there, so I am ready to postpone it to stage 1. Patch 4/4 is not solving a regression technically. First two patches can be also committed into 8 branch. If no discussion occurs, I’ll commit them later this week, e.g. on friday. Roman