public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
To: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>, fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: reject MODULE PROCEDURE outside generic module interface [PR99036]
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:31:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f9d0dc1-21d8-5b55-dc66-a12a5f8c114a@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-fe491b4b-66a9-4d21-b8b1-9af4b907aa10-1679345864578@3c-app-gmx-bap50>

On 20.03.23 21:57, Harald Anlauf via Gcc-patches wrote:
> --- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
> @@ -9998,6 +9998,7 @@ gfc_match_modproc (void)
>     if ((gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_INTERFACE
>          && gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_CONTAINS)
>         || gfc_state_stack->previous == NULL
> +      || !current_interface.type
>         || current_interface.type == INTERFACE_NAMELESS
>         || current_interface.type == INTERFACE_ABSTRACT)
>       {

First, I do not like '!var' comparisons for enum values,
only for Booleans/logicals and pointer.

Secondly, I am not sure that it is really guaranteed that
the value is 0.

I think something like the following makes more sense
and, as just tried, it also regtests (w/ your testcase included).
If you agree, feel free to package and commit it.


diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
index c8f0bb83c2c..233bf244d62 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
@@ -9996,7 +9996,8 @@ gfc_match_modproc (void)
    gfc_interface *old_interface_head, *interface;

-  if ((gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_INTERFACE
-       && gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_CONTAINS)
-      || gfc_state_stack->previous == NULL
+  if (gfc_state_stack->previous == NULL
+      || (gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_INTERFACE
+         && (gfc_state_stack->state != COMP_CONTAINS
+             || gfc_state_stack->previous->state != COMP_INTERFACE))
        || current_interface.type == INTERFACE_NAMELESS
        || current_interface.type == INTERFACE_ABSTRACT)


Thanks for working on this and all the other issues!

Tobias

-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20 20:57 Harald Anlauf
2023-03-21  7:09 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-21  8:31 ` Tobias Burnus [this message]
2023-03-21 19:10   ` Harald Anlauf
2023-03-21 19:10     ` Harald Anlauf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f9d0dc1-21d8-5b55-dc66-a12a5f8c114a@codesourcery.com \
    --to=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=anlauf@gmx.de \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).