From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 50621 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2017 22:58:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 50607 invoked by uid 89); 20 Nov 2017 22:58:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:0.2017.11.20.14 X-HELO: mail-pf0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-pf0-f171.google.com) (209.85.192.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 22:58:26 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f171.google.com with SMTP id i15so8389960pfa.3 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:58:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qwFrcrPB0C8iA/FyvEOSU0XnEkJp+2kwzPQpo1IvrNE=; b=QoAFbQqRBApVX3swN7OnK4Ii7hcxeI1um6GoA6BIFvyXTIUXm0IRLlCgWweMqPgxQS FkJ9BcYDKjd1dg/GJNIVzDYh2MaDUiYi7Sv+7eW5+AwCvpgGbJZkgmuOSgpO+SHroPS5 7qQfC2lAcNP/pYfFm/MB2EHiS6XeM82/OrII0BafYBG3ukA9gWnM2vQs3rbJnTwWm1Dm b8wyGdBx0jQHjcr0vKBH9MtVXhl9pOy4iu/LOvuZ1cPgyyOt2ErnTEXp3uBQtLdmvK0S eMrNYwE095nHKSzHqtWciLhOEXcmo6WwC5Nij9yt9OXomnBYjO/kYq2cTZ/Ak7+rmuwd 312g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX48D3j8wFlrrvddcOGZjNyHEUE3UCh3JbIJriqj82sClm09Orjl izIwJ71AGsRKeVMk+Tl63RVX5Jx4Ujg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbc0saWlBQHMaCqwzzLdhcZiFvsrIB42dO3W10u4xtq3HimJOHuK0AdFpcCzXj8l7xUqOLrdA== X-Received: by 10.99.106.137 with SMTP id f131mr15105306pgc.334.1511218704423; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:58:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.17.0.120] ([12.206.222.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g9sm19718453pfk.0.2017.11.20.14.58.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:58:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Patch ping To: Jakub Jelinek , Jason Merrill , Nathan Sidwell Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20171120075512.GE14653@tucnak> From: Jim Wilson Message-ID: <7faf2079-f3d2-2b9c-5d08-107cad3eb859@sifive.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:16:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171120075512.GE14653@tucnak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg01839.txt.bz2 On 11/19/2017 11:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I'd like to ping the following patches: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01895.html > PR debug/82718 > Fix DWARF5 .debug_loclist handling with hot/cold partitioning I already responded to this one. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01268.html The dwarf2out.c patch looks good to me, though the testcase does not fail on unpatched mainline anymore. I had to go back to the 2017-10-22 snapshot to see the failure. There was a followup from Mark Wielaard mentioning that elfutils still fails on mainline, so maybe we can get a testcase from there. Jim