From: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Stefan Kneifel <stefan.kneifel@bluewin.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix emissing of __builtin_cpu_supports.
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:07:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80d628c2-ea0d-c542-b0bb-399d83b7292d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214102828.GU2646553@tucnak>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 448 bytes --]
On 12/14/21 11:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Wouldn't this be better done only if field_val has the msb set
Yes, updated in the attached patch.
> and keep the CONVERT_EXPR otherwise (why isn't it NOP_EXPR?)?
Dunno, but I can prepare a separate patch (likely stage1 material,
right)? Note that are other places that also use CONVERT_EXPR.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-i386-Fix-emissing-of-__builtin_cpu_supports.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1342 bytes --]
From 227450e9f3a506fdfcff67aa45135fe31f3f91f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:34:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i386: Fix emissing of __builtin_cpu_supports.
PR target/103661
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/i386/i386-builtins.c (fold_builtin_cpu): Compare to 0
as API expects that non-zero values are returned (do that
it mask == 31).
For "avx512vbmi2" argument, we return now 1 << 31, which is a
negative integer value.
---
gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c
index 0fb14b55712..bca244fc011 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.c
@@ -2353,7 +2353,11 @@ fold_builtin_cpu (tree fndecl, tree *args)
/* Return __cpu_model.__cpu_features[0] & field_val */
final = build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, unsigned_type_node, array_elt,
build_int_cstu (unsigned_type_node, field_val));
- return build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, integer_type_node, final);
+ if (isa_names_table[i].feature == 31)
+ return build2 (NE_EXPR, integer_type_node, final,
+ build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, 0));
+ else
+ return build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, integer_type_node, final);
}
gcc_unreachable ();
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-14 9:55 Martin Liška
2021-12-14 10:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-14 15:07 ` Martin Liška [this message]
2021-12-14 16:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-15 9:57 ` [PATCH] i386: simplify cpu_feature handling Martin Liška
2021-12-16 20:58 ` Stefan Kneifel
2021-12-17 8:50 ` Martin Liška
2022-01-03 11:43 ` Martin Liška
2022-03-31 7:01 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-02 7:57 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-11 8:19 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-11 8:27 ` Uros Bizjak
2022-05-11 8:50 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-11 8:57 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80d628c2-ea0d-c542-b0bb-399d83b7292d@suse.cz \
--to=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=stefan.kneifel@bluewin.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).