From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81047 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2017 16:34:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 80989 invoked by uid 89); 7 Mar 2017 16:34:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1017, marketing X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:34:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDD5781247; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-120-51.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.51] (may be forged)) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v27GYALa014585; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:34:10 -0500 Subject: Re: i386-unknown-freebsd -> i586-unknown-freebsd To: Gerald Pfeifer , Richard Biener References: <5742CA86.10200@foss.arm.com> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan , Andreas Tobler , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <80ed20a2-fff0-a156-3071-87d588c79a39@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:34:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2 On 03/04/2017 09:40 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2016, Richard Biener wrote: >>> As Jeff noted, i386 actually is the "marketing" name used for the >>> platform, GCC has been defaulting to i486 for ages, and I upgraded >>> to i586 last year: >>> >>> 2015-11-15 Gerald Pfeifer >>> >>> * config/i386/freebsd.h (SUBTARGET32_DEFAULT_CPU): Change to i586. >>> Remove support for FreeBSD 5 and earlier. >> Can we update to a non-marketing name then, like i586-unknown-freebsd please? >> config.gcc accepts i[34567]86-*-freebsd*. It at least confused me. > > Sooo, I finally got to submitting the patch below to the config.guess > maintainers. > > When/if this has been accepted, is it okay to pull the latest config.guess > into GCC even at this stage of the release process? (We're only looking > at this change and the addition of nsx-tandem compared to what we have > right now.) If it's just those, I'd think it'd be reasonable. jeff