From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-461150-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 127362 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2017 10:45:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 127166 invoked by uid 89); 30 Aug 2017 10:45:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit
X-HELO: mx1.suse.de
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:45:39 +0000
Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254])	by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C255AABA6;	Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:45:37 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Introduce configure flag --with-stage1-cflags.
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <41109217-1bf5-b112-e783-8040196fd410@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc0mXd8Wugs4cHUGaDRXnWdshV4NCURA4R+=3Nm=PtpFsw@mail.gmail.com> <20170526115155.GL8499@tucnak> <CAFiYyc0q8fKcSZ2FwKuXW7V_niNzN4kBUYouwwYUrkWkohx5Qg@mail.gmail.com> <b3c3fe8c-b8c6-ea19-df59-f2613dbf92e6@suse.cz> <f2a4a836-fad3-c3ec-02f9-03c71107fa9d@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc1fxbwDdUnGaz2mRyz+meRBUqSXp=-a9i=sk7k-gYXn-g@mail.gmail.com> <bdf9f849-f903-3a61-b569-b83de94a1204@suse.cz> <b8c778a1-4eb7-649e-633f-e91296a1d5e1@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc3_y+Eesa5mT8vxCoON=_a8+11UO_tQ2sGuvxCoogT+JA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <8112344d-edff-2f5b-7e94-7e5b63ce858d@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:19:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3_y+Eesa5mT8vxCoON=_a8+11UO_tQ2sGuvxCoogT+JA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg01713.txt.bz2

On 08/28/2017 02:24 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/31/2017 01:47 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> I would like to ping this. Input from other people will be appreciated ;)
>> I think the thing to keep in mind here is that IIUC this only affects
>> things when we've configured using the --with-stage1-cflags option.
>>
>> So questions about is -O1 more stable than -O2, should we restrict -O2
>> to newer compilers, etc are really more about the defaults we set.
>>
>> My understanding is the patch is just adding the capability and does not
>> change the default.  Assuming that's the case, then I'm comfortable
>> acking the raw infrastructure.
> 
> OTOH you can simply set STAGE1_CFLAGS so the value of this
> as a configure option is somewhat questionable.

Yes, STAGE1_CFLAGS is a working solution. I'm not planning to install the patch.

Martin

> 
>> jeff