From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC3D3858C33 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5BC3D3858C33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27P4mD7O009463; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:22 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=CYScmB2nnquXTI8MS/PsnEo16AlKrUsYXH32Q9WlMHI=; b=HNDFRqW+8VkBzLaqBfC1ugHlkEi9VNGZNaNaHwgHEr26LHPXTfS0OsmPMroCP0lGcYGs W+eyP1IAyweLINNQPwoHA602cIbSMuY0WWOEknoU3Rvy1HhwjX/TGSHJb4RozRhuyH5k DnvGrAbBFBtBi1HJaqoQZLb2fGOT6eEW6m2rSvKuId/BSSOnD0gp0Mpj4qh0EAawrcrO n0dh7dZO/OsBQ3m/qg7SaQBpE/F06URx5DZu76lmhXodrMbqBCUcakYoezS+P1l8Nasv fzjZu0ThEHYVOOQ3C7baQycDmt/W1fN+xxMF1rLKtCgix59izlbr43jHvGiQoSrjImB/ Ng== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j62cc0r8j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:22 +0000 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27P4nfxP012976; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:21 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j62cc0r7v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:21 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 27P55LLf010412; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:20 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3j2q88wxc9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:19 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 27P5MGLB35848698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:17 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DCE4C044; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A7B4C040; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.197.231.70] (unknown [9.197.231.70]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 05:22:14 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <8177d3a3-ec97-c15e-dddd-ec88930757dd@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:22:11 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Change insn condition from TARGET_64BIT to TARGET_POWERPC64 for VSX scalar extract/insert instructions Content-Language: en-US To: HAO CHEN GUI , David Cc: gcc-patches , Peter Bergner , Segher Boessenkool References: <2ffb2ff4-540d-3bcf-4e4e-478acbdd910d@linux.ibm.com> <20220823142620.GU25951@gate.crashing.org> <55bbac6d-7595-df10-0a2b-e09ca25f90f5@linux.ibm.com> From: "Kewen.Lin" In-Reply-To: <55bbac6d-7595-df10-0a2b-e09ca25f90f5@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: YuDYIGN5g5AAdocyPfRlOb8Tm_22_wL5 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Yf1bGAdT-UiMVLjPRQm9r9Lc9dpPsMB3 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-25_03,2022-08-22_02,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=955 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2208250017 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: on 2022/8/25 11:37, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/8/2022 下午 1:24, Kewen.Lin wrote: >> Could you try to test with dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -mpowerpc64" all the time, but still >> having that has_arch_ppc64 effective target on aix? >> >> I'd expect has_arch_ppc64 check to fail on aix 32bit, the error will not be a problem (turning >> into an UNSUPPORTED then)? > > I tested it on AIX. "has_arch_ppc64" fails with dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -mpowerpc64" on > 32-bit AIX environment. It works as we expected. Nice, thanks for your time on testing. > > Also I found that AIX and Darwin are skipped for bfp test. So in testcase, it's no need to care > about them. Not sure if it's intention. > > In bfp.exp > > # Exit immediately if this isn't a PowerPC target or if the target is > # aix or Darwin. > if { (![istarget powerpc*-*-*] && ![istarget rs6000-*-*]) > || [istarget "powerpc*-*-aix*"] > || [istarget "powerpc*-*-darwin*"] } then { > return > } I can't find a hint about why we wanted to disable bfp testing on aix, it looks like a overkill to me. Could you help to further test if all test cases in this small bucket available on aix? Maybe it can give us some evidences on why it's intentional or not. Hi David & Segher, Do you have some insights on this? BR, Kewen