From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 109901 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2019 08:05:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 109893 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2019 08:05:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*Ad:D*cz, yourself, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mx1.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx1.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:05:38 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4791AE04; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 08:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mklog improvements To: Jeff Law , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <865c031e-856d-2e22-08ea-950097a6ea9c@suse.cz> <924bb851-fbcb-306c-d95c-a9386339643a@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= Message-ID: <82232669-1f90-ca59-d7a0-7354a9388b99@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:05:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <924bb851-fbcb-306c-d95c-a9386339643a@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 On 9/3/19 6:37 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 8/30/19 2:55 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> PING^1 >> >> On 8/13/19 9:49 AM, Martin Liska wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I'm sending format independent changes to mklog that should >>> improve the script. It addresses couple of improvement >>> mentioned here: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-08/msg00031.html >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> Martin Liska (3): >>> Use argparse.ArgumentParser for mklog. >>> mklog: parse PR references from new test files >>> mklog: Do not print changed functions in testsuite > So there's a ton of follow-ups (primarily between Jakub and yourself). Yes, the follow up is about possible change to ChangeLog format. I first provided a patch, but later I realized that I would rather stick with the current format. > > What's the state of the changes Jakub has requested? Can we go forward > with the patch as-is and iterate on further improvements? Yes, I'm going to install these 3 patches which do not change the format. Martin > > Jeff >