From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E8A3858D20 for ; Sun, 21 May 2023 19:24:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 39E8A3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1a516fb6523so48095225ad.3 for ; Sun, 21 May 2023 12:24:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684697039; x=1687289039; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NYYaby2xT9f1R8o+gcS4E09ymkQnGGhGTcyGaceAsgM=; b=WhONtEgH5AG7q8E7g+9ODmH47jfZq3FF24q9XBtAGc+6GKgvhL1k+L1Tu35tKFe6pL YIYDMg+NqKiZGLqoKXqo9sUuBSgp0cr//qpsoxXeL1stiSUwNv6v7+iGHdO05pZbeDwl KQAmEVqUrinScWewWajDbVE87UoHtP11lJceEMK92aFhO+mTU/o9fkhmE66o8XecuSb4 ZaQ3Q79vKbiJmGl3KGIsSpFFPNa5SbgjZEvDRI6hFbQM42Bcw3XlfofGjYhJRe4PyjS9 YuKn5GDnmr/qgowpWtrCBmNWv5mvWV93uCFZKyKpv87nlw82gE/iGho59XXcZTr6mydp ptcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684697039; x=1687289039; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NYYaby2xT9f1R8o+gcS4E09ymkQnGGhGTcyGaceAsgM=; b=bHINqBAUCYRtDKuvj9Kt3s/W9cN+7aabx37tB1ZxV9cfPmQXMts+KKZ+O6VWE0oGql TUL5xoWaDEkUkk4QNTxfR/Fnlib9+WQUntEhqI/PRy5ygKM+tHLPAmcHT7+Qd07QPK3L Z4pDbCxlM1mGmtsbvIa5WqhUe40J61Q4KWEeBUCJyrT3KSWpnn1JCWhq7cA82fRauYAN momAa/LCQxV4k3p6q/MtzmhsVQ4SMZuKY48DF20vXMdIUzj/EDhv0CGOvipHGtAv+hv6 wEVZGzNYWv272YnZozS5bT5dXEnG8OWxuarNDfI47s6oxg88yNJ0qFvff99bB4okImDA Da/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwUvcAsRYoVPhLHWceb0sJIU8qVoEqTexQE1Uv5NdS+oxRMETky ++DwaLwjk4/IJ6ktcwrAGPs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6ehvMS0xkJ7gmHbtzV0iC5LHvSxBmYQcVPOKqe8ggn7QyUXGf16j7IprIetKRbdjjspCo1YA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e549:b0:1a9:9a18:345c with SMTP id n9-20020a170902e54900b001a99a18345cmr10973093plf.44.1684697038910; Sun, 21 May 2023 12:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2607:fb90:469:b40a:c15c:6a92:5516:c5a5? ([2607:fb90:469:b40a:c15c:6a92:5516:c5a5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 21-20020a170902c21500b001ae8587d60csm3250509pll.265.2023.05.21.12.23.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 May 2023 12:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8251e3b9-380c-d768-c608-777e2cd09acb@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 13:23:56 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Expand directly for single bit test Content-Language: en-US To: Andrew Pinski , David Edelsohn Cc: Andrew Pinski , GCC Patches References: From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 5/21/23 12:25, Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:17 AM David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches > wrote: >> >> Hi, Andrew >> >> Thanks for this series of patches to improve do_store_flag. Unfortunately >> this specific patch in the series has caused a bootstrap failure on >> powerpc-aix. I bisected this failure to this specific patch. Note that I >> am building as 32 bit, so this could be a specific issue about bit size. >> >> * expr.cc (fold_single_bit_test): Rename to ... >> (expand_single_bit_test): This and expand directly. >> (do_store_flag): Update for the rename function. > > Did this include the fix I did for big-endian at > r14-1022-g7f3df8e65c71e5 ? I had found that I broke big-endian last > night with that patch and pushed the fix once I figured out what I did > wrong. > If you already tried post the fix, I will try to look into it as soon > as possible. FWIW, the various failing hosts from yesterday in my tester have all returned to successful builds after the BE fixes. m32r, iq2000, moxie, sh3eb, h8300. There's a very reasonable chance the PPC bug is the same underlying issue. Jeff