From: Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@arm.com>
To: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
jakub@redhat.com, ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AARCH64] PR target/84521 Fix frame pointer corruption with -fomit-frame-pointer with __builtin_setjmp
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 19:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <834489bd-c76b-7c9a-6a97-58e097dd98c2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180319121142.GA36085@arm.com>
On 19/03/18 12:11, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:40:49PM +0000, Sudi Das wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This patch is another partial fix for PR 84521. This is adding a
>> definition to one of the target hooks used in the SJLJ implemetation so
>> that AArch64 defines the hard_frame_pointer_rtx as the
>> TARGET_BUILTIN_SETJMP_FRAME_VALUE. As pointed out by Wilco there is
>> still a lot more work to be done for these builtins in the future.
>>
>> Testing: Bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and added
>> new test.
>>
>> Is this ok for trunk?
>
> OK.
Thanks James but I realized I marked this wrong as only AArch64 patch.
This also has a mid change so cc'ing more people for approval.
Sudi
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>> *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
>>
>> 2018-03-14 Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@arm.com>
>>
>> * builtins.c (expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver): Update condition
>> to restore frame pointer.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (DONT_USE_BUILTIN_SETJMP): Update
>> comment.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_builtin_setjmp_frame_value):
>> New.
>> (TARGET_BUILTIN_SETJMP_FRAME_VALUE): Define.
>>
>> *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***
>>
>> 2018-03-14 Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@arm.com>
>>
>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr84521.c: New test.
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/builtins.c b/gcc/builtins.c
>> index 85affa7..640f1a9 100644
>> --- a/gcc/builtins.c
>> +++ b/gcc/builtins.c
>> @@ -898,7 +898,8 @@ expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver (rtx receiver_label)
>>
>> /* Now put in the code to restore the frame pointer, and argument
>> pointer, if needed. */
>> - if (! targetm.have_nonlocal_goto ())
>> + if (! targetm.have_nonlocal_goto ()
>> + && targetm.builtin_setjmp_frame_value () != hard_frame_pointer_rtx)
>> {
>> /* First adjust our frame pointer to its actual value. It was
>> previously set to the start of the virtual area corresponding to
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
>> index e3c52f6..7a21c14 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
>> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h
>> @@ -474,7 +474,9 @@ extern unsigned aarch64_architecture_version;
>> #define EH_RETURN_STACKADJ_RTX gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, R4_REGNUM)
>> #define EH_RETURN_HANDLER_RTX aarch64_eh_return_handler_rtx ()
>>
>> -/* Don't use __builtin_setjmp until we've defined it. */
>> +/* Don't use __builtin_setjmp until we've defined it.
>> + CAUTION: This macro is only used during exception unwinding.
>> + Don't fall for its name. */
>> #undef DONT_USE_BUILTIN_SETJMP
>> #define DONT_USE_BUILTIN_SETJMP 1
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> index e1fb87f..e7ac0fe 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> @@ -12128,6 +12128,13 @@ aarch64_expand_builtin_va_start (tree valist, rtx nextarg ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>> expand_expr (t, const0_rtx, VOIDmode, EXPAND_NORMAL);
>> }
>>
>> +/* Implement TARGET_BUILTIN_SETJMP_FRAME_VALUE. */
>> +static rtx
>> +aarch64_builtin_setjmp_frame_value (void)
>> +{
>> + return hard_frame_pointer_rtx;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Implement TARGET_GIMPLIFY_VA_ARG_EXPR. */
>>
>> static tree
>> @@ -17505,6 +17512,9 @@ aarch64_run_selftests (void)
>> #undef TARGET_FOLD_BUILTIN
>> #define TARGET_FOLD_BUILTIN aarch64_fold_builtin
>>
>> +#undef TARGET_BUILTIN_SETJMP_FRAME_VALUE
>> +#define TARGET_BUILTIN_SETJMP_FRAME_VALUE aarch64_builtin_setjmp_frame_value
>> +
>> #undef TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG
>> #define TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG aarch64_function_arg
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr84521.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr84521.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..76b10d2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr84521.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target indirect_jumps } */
>> +
>> +#include <setjmp.h>
>> +
>> +jmp_buf buf;
>> +
>> +int uses_longjmp (void)
>> +{
>> + __builtin_longjmp (buf, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int gl;
>> +void after_longjmp (void)
>> +{
>> + gl = 5;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int
>> +test_1 (int n)
>> +{
>> + volatile int *p = alloca (n);
>> + if (__builtin_setjmp (buf))
>> + {
>> + after_longjmp ();
>> + }
>> + else
>> + {
>> + uses_longjmp ();
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __attribute__ ((optimize ("no-omit-frame-pointer")))
>> +test_2 (int n)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + int *ptr = (int *)__builtin_alloca (sizeof (int) * n);
>> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
>> + ptr[i] = i;
>> + test_1 (n);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int main (int argc, const char **argv)
>> +{
>> + __builtin_memset (&buf, 0xaf, sizeof (buf));
>> + test_2 (100);
>> +}
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-20 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 18:07 Sudakshina Das
2018-03-19 12:12 ` James Greenhalgh
2018-03-20 19:36 ` Sudakshina Das [this message]
2018-05-02 17:29 ` Jeff Law
2018-06-07 13:04 ` Sudakshina Das
2018-06-07 15:33 ` Eric Botcazou
2018-06-14 11:10 ` Sudakshina Das
2018-06-25 9:25 ` Sudakshina Das
2018-06-26 21:45 ` James Greenhalgh
2018-06-26 22:33 ` Eric Botcazou
2018-06-27 8:12 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2018-06-27 8:26 ` Eric Botcazou
2018-06-27 11:22 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2018-07-12 17:01 ` Sudakshina Das
2018-07-31 21:42 ` James Greenhalgh
2018-07-31 21:49 ` Andrew Pinski
2018-08-01 10:33 ` Sudakshina Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=834489bd-c76b-7c9a-6a97-58e097dd98c2@arm.com \
--to=sudi.das@arm.com \
--cc=Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=james.greenhalgh@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).