From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 79551 invoked by alias); 19 May 2017 17:25:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79527 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2017 17:25:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:306 X-HELO: fencepost.gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (208.118.235.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2017 17:25:41 +0000 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4236 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dBleo-0008Ce-1n; Fri, 19 May 2017 13:25:42 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 17:26:00 -0000 Message-Id: <838tls3gjc.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <68029888-74e5-7cd3-1a66-2e58919a6435@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Fri, 19 May 2017 16:36:46 +0100) Subject: Re: MinGW compilation warnings in libiberty's waitpid.c Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <83inlbcqsp.fsf@gnu.org> <68029888-74e5-7cd3-1a66-2e58919a6435@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg01599.txt.bz2 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:36:46 +0100 > > So I wonder whether we could just unconditionally remove the waitpid > replacement instead. That's probably the best path forward.