From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
thomas@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: MinGW compilation warnings in libiberty's xstrndup.c
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a8683ler.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60a354b0-6c1a-15ea-177a-8bdb198c8c03@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Fri, 19 May 2017 16:22:55 +0100)
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:22:55 +0100
>
> But then, xstrndup.c has at the top:
>
> #ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
> #include <string.h>
> #else
> # ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H
> # include <strings.h>
> # endif
> #endif
>
> So I would expect your build to pick the strnlen declaration from
> one of the string.h or strings.h mingw headers. Why didn't it?
Because MinGW doesn't have it, not unless you build a program that
will require one of the newer versions of the Windows C runtime
library. That's why libiberty's strnlen is being compiled in the
MinGW build in the first place.
Specifically, the MinGW headers do provide a prototype for strnlen if
the program defines __MSVCRT_VERSION__ to be a high enough version, or
defines _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200809L, but none of these is set by
default, and is not a good idea, as explained above, for a program
that needs to run on a wide variety of OS versions.
IOW, libiberty shouldn't rely on the system headers to provide a
strnlen prototype when libiberty's strnlen is being included in the
library as a replacement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-19 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-08 15:37 Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 15:27 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-19 15:47 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-05-19 16:08 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-19 22:28 ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-19 22:31 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-19 22:56 ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-19 23:22 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-20 1:25 ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-22 16:28 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-26 21:49 ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-28 18:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-31 6:17 ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-31 6:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83a8683ler.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).