public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: MinGW compilation warnings in libiberty's waitpid.c
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 19:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83poezml4x.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xnk258hebj.fsf@greed.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie on	Mon, 22 May 2017 15:38:40 -0400)

> From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:38:40 -0400
> 
> Since (or "if") nobody will (should) use waitpid() on mingw anyway, and
> since libiberty really wants to include waitpid.o, how difficult would
> it be to use some #ifdefs to have waitpid() just return an error on
> mingw?  That at least gets past the mingw build problem.

Instead of making waitpid an always-failing stub on MinGW, wouldn't it
be better to make it work on MinGW?  Like this:

--- libiberty/waitpid.c~0	2016-08-01 18:50:21.000000000 +0300
+++ libiberty/waitpid.c	2017-05-23 21:19:34.302415000 +0300
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ does the return value.  The third argume
 #include <sys/wait.h>
 #endif
 
+#ifdef __MINGW32__
+#include <process.h>
+#define wait(s)  _cwait(s,pid,_WAIT_CHILD)
+#endif
+
 pid_t
 waitpid (pid_t pid, int *stat_loc, int options ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 {

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-08 15:30 Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-19 15:40 ` Pedro Alves
2017-05-19 17:26   ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-20  5:02 ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-21 16:12   ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-22 19:55     ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-23 19:26       ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-05-23 19:38         ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-24  2:26           ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-24  3:31             ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-24 18:47               ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-24 22:16                 ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-26  8:54                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-26 16:38                     ` Joel Brobecker
2017-05-26 18:04                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-05-27  0:28                         ` Joel Brobecker
2017-05-26 18:14                       ` DJ Delorie
2017-05-27 15:58                       ` Iain Buclaw
2017-05-30 17:23                         ` Joel Brobecker
2017-06-06 17:54                           ` Iain Buclaw
2017-06-07 12:38                             ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83poezml4x.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).