From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15701 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2007 17:23:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 15693 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2007 17:23:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.243) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:23:12 +0100 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c10so1559416ana for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.144.11 with SMTP id r11mr3055551and.1177262590804; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.201.16 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <84fc9c000704221023x1ece5ed9ja6d87b846e88545c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:02:00 -0000 From: "Richard Guenther" To: "Steven Bosscher" Subject: Re: Patch ping ( Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "Jan Hubicka" , iant@google.com In-Reply-To: <200704212307.52679.steven@gcc.gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070418001818.GD11352@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200704212307.52679.steven@gcc.gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg01417.txt.bz2 On 4/21/07, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Wednesday 18 April 2007 02:18, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to ping the patch > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01169.html > > that removes line nmuber notes from RTL. I think it is quite important > > cleanup and would like it to receive testing within mainline for some > > period of time. > > I think this is a really nice cleanup. It's a shame that no-one has > approved this work yet. > > The patch looks OK to me, but I can of course not approve it. I looked over the patch and I agree it's ok. So, if nobody objects this patch is ok for mainline (approving a patch for a part of gcc that I'm not too familiar with). Thanks, Richard.