public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard Guenther" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: "Jan Hubicka" <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@google.com>,
	 	"Andrew MacLeod" <amacleod@redhat.com>,
	"Jan Hubicka" <jh@suse.cz>,
	 	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Continue stmt branch prediction
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84fc9c000803130221x3e52a493y3d707dff78a9ebeb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313013740.GO24550@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > On 3/5/08 2:28 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>  >
>  > >I will give it one last try.  I think the misunderstanding can be here.
>  > >The prediction hint is not affecting edges *out* of the block it sits
>  > >in. When lowered, it is affecting all the edges that are going from
>  > >basic block not postdominated by the block to basic block postdominated
>  > >by the block (here the course of execution is crossing the point that it
>  > >inavoidably leads to the place PREDICT_EXPR is).  Think of abort call:
>  > >it is affecting all conditionals that are guarding it in the program.
>  >
>  > Ah, I see now.  Yes, I think I finally got your point.  Adding
>  > PREDICT_EXPR is fine with me.
>
>  Great :)
>  Thanks for time needed to get through this!
>
> >
>  > Instead of having to special-case it in places like DCE, how about we
>  > make it produce a value which is assigned to an artificial volatile
>  > global temporary?  This way, we don't need to touch the optimizers, they
>  > will all naturally back away from moving and/or removing it.
>
>  This decision is definitly up to you.  I can definitly make PREDICT_EXPR
>  an expression tree instead of GIMPLE statement and put it into
>  MODIFY_EXPR destinating some dummy volatile.  This seems bit hackish way
>  to me to save one case label in DCE: DCE is a bit special among the
>  early passes in a way that it does worry about more side effects of
>  statements beside the usual operands+semantics of statements all the
>  other propagation passes are about.  DCE has to know all GIMPLE
>  statement types (and it just aborts on any new). I would tend to argue
>  that with exception of DCE we can hardly come with early scalar cleanup
>  pass that really do care here and will need to special case MODIFY_EXPR
>  statement.

I also think this is a hack and adjusting DCE sounds more natural.  A
volatile global will also affect optimization because of the needed
VOPs.

Richard.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-13  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-09 20:59 Jan Hubicka
2008-02-10 14:00 ` Diego Novillo
2008-02-10 15:49   ` Jan Hubicka
2008-02-11  2:51     ` Diego Novillo
2008-02-11  8:21       ` Jan Hubicka
2008-02-11 22:42 ` Andrew MacLeod
2008-02-14 15:31   ` Jan Hubicka
2008-02-14 15:38     ` Richard Guenther
2008-02-14 17:49       ` Jan Hubicka
2008-02-14 18:27         ` Andrew MacLeod
2008-02-14 19:12           ` Jan Hubicka
2008-02-14 15:45     ` Andrew MacLeod
2008-02-14 18:11       ` Jan Hubicka
2008-03-05 18:33   ` Jan Hubicka
2008-03-05 22:10     ` Diego Novillo
2008-03-05 22:28       ` Jan Hubicka
2008-03-12 17:54         ` Diego Novillo
2008-03-13  1:38           ` Jan Hubicka
2008-03-13  1:41             ` Jan Hubicka
2008-03-13  9:21             ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2008-03-13 14:12             ` Diego Novillo
2008-03-19  6:33 ` H.J. Lu
2008-03-19 11:25   ` Jan Hubicka
2008-03-19 11:37     ` Richard Guenther
2008-03-19 11:45       ` Jan Hubicka
2008-03-19 13:21         ` Richard Guenther
2008-02-20 22:53 Bradley Lucier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84fc9c000803130221x3e52a493y3d707dff78a9ebeb@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
    --cc=dnovillo@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=jh@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).