From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-220853-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5018 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2008 20:49:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 5010 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2008 20:49:23 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:49:06 +0000
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so2672693wfc.14         for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.5.21 with SMTP id h21mr6279988wfi.175.1214340534789;         Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.162.1 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <84fc9c000806241348uf6d126fpb8f2da030bf5359d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:56:00 -0000
From: "Richard Guenther" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael Espindola" <espindola@google.com>
Subject: Re: [lto][patch] remove local variables from types (after gimplification)
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <38a0d8450806241344k1d8c730dgfb7ab717c112a8d6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <38a0d8450806230743s2e1bdcd9q71b6266b85eef73d@mail.gmail.com> 	 <84fc9c000806240214i38e62c88y75957c6eaaab567d@mail.gmail.com> 	 <38a0d8450806240604r71457d6etfade401b0a38ab04@mail.gmail.com> 	 <84fc9c000806240617me7aa397n2afde424583222ce@mail.gmail.com> 	 <38a0d8450806241326w5f03bf3bo4c6e16eff91f675f@mail.gmail.com> 	 <84fc9c000806241338h4dd59febt5171443a84b285c4@mail.gmail.com> 	 <38a0d8450806241344k1d8c730dgfb7ab717c112a8d6@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg01536.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Rafael Espindola <espindola@google.com> wrote:
>> Looks good.  Did you figure out the expr.c and calls.c hunks were not needed?
>
> I added them in my previous patch :-)

Yes, but they made sense to me, which is why I ask ;)

Richard.