From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 114367 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2016 17:51:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 114333 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jun 2016 17:51:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:877fe1n, H*MI:sk:87y46m1, H*MI:sk:576AD79, H*MI:sk:5751B5E X-HELO: resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.161) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:51:03 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-16v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.240]) by resqmta-po-02v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id G8lRbHVzOBAXOG8mLbJXjK; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:51:01 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.248]) by resomta-po-16v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id AHqz1t00p5N1HX401Hr05y; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:51:01 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [Patch, avr] Fix PR 71151 From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <576C0B5E.4070102@gjlay.de> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:51:00 -0000 Cc: Senthil Kumar Selvaraj , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Denis Chertykov Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8556CA62-884D-4244-98FD-0E867ED758BE@comcast.net> References: <87y46m1h3y.fsf@atmel.com> <5751B5EA.5000108@gjlay.de> <877fe1nrdy.fsf@atmel.com> <87lh258ufn.fsf@atmel.com> <576AD79E.6090209@gjlay.de> <87inx0ietv.fsf@atmel.com> <576C0B5E.4070102@gjlay.de> To: Georg-Johann Lay X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg01704.txt.bz2 On Jun 23, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >>>>> Maybe even check during configure whether an appropriate version of B= inutils is used? >> That would be nice, but is it ok to add target specific conditions to >> configure.ac? >=20 > We already have avr-specific tests in gcc/configure.ac Further, the only point of configure is to have target specific tests in it= . :-)