public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Cesar Philippidis
	<cesar@codesourcery.com>,"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"
	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: inhibit the sincos optimization when the target has sin and cos instructions
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 19:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <862033F1-A268-4236-B908-558C102199B5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573628A1.1030501@codesourcery.com>

On May 13, 2016 9:18:57 PM GMT+02:00, Cesar Philippidis <cesar@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>The cse_sincos pass tries to optimize sequences such as
>
>  sin (x);
>  cos (x);
>
>into a single call to sincos, or cexpi, when available. However, the
>nvptx target has sin and cos instructions, albeit with some loss of
>precision (so it's only enabled with -ffast-math). This patch teaches
>cse_sincos pass to ignore sin, cos and cexpi instructions when the
>target can expand those calls. This yields a 6x speedup in 314.omriq
>from spec accel when running on Nvidia accelerators.
>
>Is this OK for trunk?

Isn't there an optab for sincos?  ISTR x87 handles this pass just fine and also can do sin and cos.

Richard.

>Cesar


  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-13 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-13 19:19 Cesar Philippidis
2016-05-13 19:58 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2016-05-13 20:13   ` Andrew Pinski
2016-05-17 21:10     ` Cesar Philippidis
2016-05-17 21:23       ` Andrew Pinski
2016-05-17 21:30         ` Cesar Philippidis
2016-05-18 12:29           ` Nathan Sidwell
2016-05-19  3:43             ` Cesar Philippidis
2016-05-19 11:29               ` Alexander Monakov
2016-05-19 18:42                 ` Cesar Philippidis
2016-05-19 23:30                   ` Nathan Sidwell
2016-05-19 23:12               ` Nathan Sidwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=862033F1-A268-4236-B908-558C102199B5@gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=cesar@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).