From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej@apple.com>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Patch: stab info for const fields
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8650000.1036098627@warlock.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021031211030.GG5766@codesourcery.com>
> It is valuable to be able to say "_this_ _particular_ integer needs a
> specific alignment independent of what alignment the ABI gives the
> type" but I don't see any real reason why we couldn't create a special
> type structure for that. We already have to have a notion of "these
> two types are not the same but are still compatible" in the language-
> independent type algebra.
Exactly correct; I agree that this is the right way of thinking about
these attributes.
It would be great to get all this junk out of DECLs, but it will
take some doing...
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-31 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-30 15:16 Dale Johannesen
2002-10-30 22:01 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-10-31 9:42 ` Dale Johannesen
2002-10-31 9:47 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-10-31 10:25 ` Dale Johannesen
2002-10-31 11:06 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-10-31 12:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-31 12:54 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-10-31 13:10 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-31 13:12 ` Mark Mitchell [this message]
2002-10-31 14:26 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-10-31 11:21 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-10-31 13:37 Richard Kenner
2002-10-31 13:52 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-10-31 14:05 Richard Kenner
2002-10-31 14:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2002-10-31 14:33 Richard Kenner
2002-10-31 15:14 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-31 15:24 Richard Kenner
2002-10-31 15:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-31 16:04 Richard Kenner
2002-10-31 16:26 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-10-31 20:17 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-11-01 4:52 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-11-01 3:45 Richard Kenner
2002-11-01 3:55 ` Andrew Haley
2002-11-01 4:45 Richard Kenner
2002-11-01 4:56 ` Andrew Haley
2002-11-01 4:59 Richard Kenner
2002-11-01 12:35 Richard Kenner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8650000.1036098627@warlock.codesourcery.com \
--to=mark@codesourcery.com \
--cc=dalej@apple.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).