From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAFB63858D37 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:53:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CAFB63858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-63b4e5fdb1eso593168b3a.1 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:53:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1682718784; x=1685310784; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vHuOs5q5cdqsO/jm7J3FxiYR5Qe8JNXxPEflAP1Cy3o=; b=GCHcy2m1fKN1ffY3lCwPT1pzKC78eUaN0b4RfSBBe2bK338GZJBq52HhMcythrwm11 4N8WO29DSB4Cqk46Ep8nnU44lWNYOBIZF5FfRx96aNKgt2oHS7DFviIu5hPp53NnnMlx YNiEG/XI5os/02rvl+uohNCoElrPlmZeFu5pR2i4C52FqhzpQ4Jg7QSUZMdBMnJCFgfc l0XJ4JH1jgv6RlrGVx1qYZKA/8SJi0vhBZQTtk2+c6YKqY+F0gSI9EMmaK3UdhMj6cEy nEv1nSb/1nIavZcnkOkS6C+CA0U+14QuEmUymtDfXW34ad4qJZuQ8X1VmyyNRjCBArOH v5zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682718784; x=1685310784; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vHuOs5q5cdqsO/jm7J3FxiYR5Qe8JNXxPEflAP1Cy3o=; b=dyPmTK1t/065sSH7vyUvMO2WqG1TQtYpYOQuwkxD29/dkG2P3KkkaY+j5S2szmhHWu wRfDCQGly1ZeStJ0PhhoHbTnW+6mfwE1wlUCwAtwCthfhph4y/+Oy60UqxMRGyporWx0 P2H9nEMGRSFaIUJm3ZcoHBrvrSyh5G8JE13RGLCG0DUUmTAi6+yiuDLNyTakyawSVfmH 8L7pur3oHucDO6JHDiZkMhPHqn+cyQdnWcTlHhFlnQLq8eqOb3eos+HsrDHjSitsZTaK EtaHfiTTPMdeuQDd81givgd6Pxy1NylcEDKc8kNzYXu5UXIGUmudsGmo33ck4rMPlDXh mi+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzzkITmIzXUAgKypN6pJJ4c4bypni8f4mUGxSSjgNeIuiMTHfJa +uL9m3yRrLOU1M1VpxY4WQE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6eQzU7j0/mZGrtCvyuO1UDQITKIBYRHhypG/SD9DMdXcKzO1DpSLZxpEpwGvUvJPjwy1Ncvw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ca0b:b0:1a6:4cbc:14dd with SMTP id w11-20020a170902ca0b00b001a64cbc14ddmr5359586pld.8.1682718783744; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:681:8600:13d0::99f? ([2601:681:8600:13d0::99f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jc13-20020a17090325cd00b001993a1fce7bsm13682916plb.196.2023.04.28.14.53.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <86d25964-7145-6c4b-8794-df0d521a14bb@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:53:01 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] RISC-V: Modified validation information for contracts-tmpl-spec2.C Content-Language: en-US To: shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com, wuwei2016@iscas.ac.cn, jiawei@iscas.ac.cn, shihua@iscas.ac.cn, dje.gcc@gmail.com, mirimmad@outlook.com, pinskia@gmail.com References: <20230407033702.6770-1-shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn> <20230407033702.6770-2-shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn> From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: <20230407033702.6770-2-shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 4/6/23 21:37, shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn wrote: > From: yulong > > This patch fixes the problem of the contracts-tmpl-spec2.c running failure. > When run the dejagnu test, I find that the output is inconsistent with that verified > in the testcase. So I try to modify it, and then it can be passed. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.dg/contracts/contracts-tmpl-spec2.C:delete some output information I think you need to debug why you get different output from this test. Just removing the output because it didn't match on risc-v seems wrong. jeff