From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"tom@tromey.com" <tom@tromey.com>,
Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>,
"richard.guenther@gmail.com" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>,
"uecker@tugraz.at" <uecker@tugraz.at>,
"isanbard@gmail.com" <isanbard@gmail.com>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:16:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871q7sr2un.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D9E350B5-ED3A-47C2-9C7E-11B5666DF8DF@oracle.com> (Qing Zhao's message of "Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:58:40 +0000")
> So, let’s delay the possible support to gdb in a later patch.
> Does this sound reasonable to you?
It's not really up to me, but sure. I was just curious if it perhaps
already worked, but not enough to apply the patches and find out.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-30 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-29 16:06 Qing Zhao
2024-03-29 16:06 ` [PATCH v8 1/5] Provide counted_by attribute to flexible array member field (PR108896) Qing Zhao
2024-04-10 17:35 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-10 18:05 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-10 18:44 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-10 19:21 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-10 21:56 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-11 13:17 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-10 18:25 ` Martin Uecker
2024-04-10 19:05 ` Martin Uecker
2024-04-10 19:35 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-11 6:02 ` Martin Uecker
2024-04-11 13:16 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v8 2/5] Convert references with "counted_by" attributes to/from .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE Qing Zhao
2024-04-10 18:36 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-10 19:38 ` Qing Zhao
2024-04-11 13:27 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v8 3/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in builtin object size Qing Zhao
2024-04-10 21:45 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-04-11 13:19 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v8 4/5] Use the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in bound sanitizer Qing Zhao
2024-04-10 18:37 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-10 21:46 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-04-11 13:22 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v8 5/5] Add the 6th argument to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE Qing Zhao
2024-04-10 18:38 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-10 21:48 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-04-11 13:24 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-29 18:09 ` [PATCH v8 0/5] New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) Tom Tromey
2024-03-29 19:16 ` Kees Cook
2024-03-29 19:58 ` Qing Zhao
2024-03-30 0:16 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2024-03-30 0:15 ` Tom Tromey
2024-03-30 13:57 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871q7sr2un.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=isanbard@gmail.com \
--cc=josmyers@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).