From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omta36.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net (omta36.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net [35.89.44.35]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED7F93858C31 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 00:16:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org ED7F93858C31 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org ED7F93858C31 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=35.89.44.35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711757785; cv=none; b=ddvw2GUZScA1h+DdPIugjwJ0Cime5OdpTv7qhj+I+zDvRv8UuLWUc06ucOaLL/lL6ktXKRkJnkUuQuHILt0M1Re3EHMQRTI7zJi/fpS2sS6zvn/vWRhBaOZH13gqZkTF1/LQOi2hR2GFpCdtgNLI3LEBz+VkApvMxJ2g8yJ3s48= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711757785; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ODRh5CkRVp4F0oBpyxmt1BILz3iv0nG12GnydlerPmU=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=EWtO40j/nqKAyigvMR3LrwD8q+VG4QrKiivmGI5z/x8gb6EH7S/EajaDy39EV4WZy/MINq3wC1aOoYGBMIIqKCc/h5vmG306nG2a+KbikpvsK+HVnJ6zY2tH+E6Ljmva4eR5ZaxdJHBvu0Im2po3frIha7LPLU+g9JTmiwxHUZ4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from eig-obgw-6008a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.30.227]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id qEqArYhtktf2QqMORrQY7L; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 00:16:19 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id qMOQrzbMqbhc1qMOQrnbYm; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 00:16:18 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Z7bqHmRA c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=660759d2 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=K6JAEmCyrfEA:10 a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10 a=ve3ZipjTFeYbKIU2OvMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HKflfUxu4LQJIcJL+bldhPBGK3knIISP3YfpX3tk9TU=; b=Yuw8eXd/J8rFQ7LtKJr6wTSrJN wVlPbFvq63KdieVHSTAwqOXNeR87uIsVxFQAjCKeIZPiM353fkkwdRNUQw1nWzWn2mBXaBK4vkr6u ++bUG0iR39BFiVLEibQOJUjOj; Received: from 97-122-82-115.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.82.115]:49166 helo=prentzel) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rqMOP-002Dph-2T; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:16:17 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Qing Zhao Cc: Kees Cook , "tom@tromey.com" , Joseph Myers , "richard.guenther@gmail.com" , Siddhesh Poyarekar , "uecker@tugraz.at" , "isanbard@gmail.com" , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] New attribute "counted_by" to annotate bounds for C99 FAM(PR108896) References: <20240329160703.4012941-1-qing.zhao@oracle.com> <87jzlkc3lg.fsf@tromey.com> <202403291215.BEE1F60@keescook> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 18:16:16 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Qing Zhao's message of "Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:58:40 +0000") Message-ID: <871q7sr2un.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gcc.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.82.115 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1rqMOP-002Dph-2T X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-82-115.hlrn.qwest.net (prentzel) [97.122.82.115]:49166 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 16 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfFu/Mct7ECcgeZxKsp6F2biPpIwJ8OhUKG4yJ+lLGDVoyVGErd+Q3axf+hk+EbMiPS8qErBWt6FNYEsiX9cqwvTL2HSqvw9jKNVaq1SkfZePnYvniwlM ASO3XrN0kYBVc3R1ILMQBEMxVCUofTzBPCTuGAL+MOlYmsiiFz9UZmsq8ldZdUQvww4dlaclKNrnnt7DNMxLFMGGVGXJ0aBimwE= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3015.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > So, let=E2=80=99s delay the possible support to gdb in a later patch.=20 > Does this sound reasonable to you? It's not really up to me, but sure. I was just curious if it perhaps already worked, but not enough to apply the patches and find out. Tom