From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26057 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2014 17:46:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26047 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2014 17:46:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wg0-f49.google.com Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-wg0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:46:24 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id x12so3912170wgg.32 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:46:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.71.195 with SMTP id x3mr387728wju.27.1412271981039; Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([95.145.138.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ju1sm5327567wjc.1.2014.10.02.10.46.19 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Sandiford To: Segher Boessenkool Mail-Followup-To: Segher Boessenkool ,Andrew MacLeod , Jakub Jelinek , Bernd Schmidt , gcc-patches , richard.sandiford@arm.com, rdsandiford@googlemail.com Cc: Andrew MacLeod , Jakub Jelinek , Bernd Schmidt , gcc-patches , richard.sandiford@arm.com Subject: Re: parallel check output changes? References: <541AD692.4030907@redhat.com> <20140918130109.GH17454@tucnak.redhat.com> <541AD880.7080703@redhat.com> <541AF451.3070406@redhat.com> <541B1710.8060809@codesourcery.com> <20140918173609.GM17454@tucnak.redhat.com> <20140918184455.GB28595@gate.crashing.org> <20140919093723.GA26414@gate.crashing.org> <87iokel5c0.fsf@e105548-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <5422DB41.1090800@redhat.com> <20141002164739.GA25260@gate.crashing.org> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20141002164739.GA25260@gate.crashing.org> (Segher Boessenkool's message of "Thu, 2 Oct 2014 11:47:39 -0500") Message-ID: <871tqqnz4k.fsf@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 Segher Boessenkool writes: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote: >> Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a >> branch cut from mainline from yesterday. > > Confirmed. The following patch works for me, and Andrew has tested it > as well. The comment it removes isn't valid before the patch either. I get the impression from a short dismissal like that that this script is pretty hated :-(. Remember that originally the script was trying to make the result of combining separate .sum files the same as the .sum file you'd get for -j1. As Jakub said upthread, that's a lost cause with the new approach to parallel testing, but I think the comment was valid while matching -j1 was still a goal. Thanks, Richard