public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	James Norris <jnorris@codesourcery.com>,
	Cesar Philippidis <cesar@codesourcery.com>,
	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,	"Jason Merrill" <jason@redhat.com>,
	Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PR c/64765, c/64880] Support OpenACC Combined Directives in C, C++
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 14:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737xkcfdg.fsf@schwinge.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5617C27B.9040706@acm.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 827 bytes --]

Hi Nathan!

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 09:34:51 -0400, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
> On 10/09/15 09:26, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > You mean the cp_parser_oacc_loop and cp_parser_oacc_kernels_parallel
> > functions need documentation?  I agree it's a bit terse, but documenting
> > these by just listing the accepted parsing tokens "# pragma acc loop"
> > etc., followed by the *_CLAUSE_MASKs is what's done for the other
> > OpenACC/OpenMP directives in the C/C++ front ends.  So, I don't see a
> > reason to be different for these two?
> 
> 
> What's the p_name argument for?

It's s string describing the pragma as parsed thus far.  Again, not
documenting that as well as our usage of it is totally "standard", see
OpenMP's cp_parser_omp_parallel, cp_parser_omp_for, and many more.


Grüße,
 Thomas

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 472 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-09 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-08 16:39 Thomas Schwinge
2015-10-08 16:47 ` Joseph Myers
2015-10-09 12:26 ` Nathan Sidwell
2015-10-09 13:26   ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-10-09 13:34     ` Nathan Sidwell
2015-10-09 13:57       ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-10-09 14:00       ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2015-10-11 22:19         ` Nathan Sidwell
2015-10-27  8:52 ` Thomas Schwinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8737xkcfdg.fsf@schwinge.name \
    --to=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=cesar@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=jnorris@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=nathan@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).